Subscribe Sign in

Culture

AI CEOs say they need to slow the pace of development. But will they?

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceTechnologyAnthropicOpenAISam Altman

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A2×2 A3×3 A4 A9 C1 C2×2 D1 D2×3 D3×10 D4 E3×3 E4 F2×4 all 30 rules
  • After apocalyptic warnings about the threats posed by AI, leaders like Sam Altman and Elon Musk backed Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s calls to ‘slow the pace’.
  • In a display of unity, the heads of the largest US artificial intelligence companies all agreed at once.
  • The AI CEOs’ warnings and promises open up a host of questions about how AI might be regulated, what risks it poses and whether the industry will slow down the fevered race to advance its technology.
  • The US federal government is committed to a global AI arms race.
  • On Sunday, Trump once again rejected calls for slowing down AI development while citing competition from China and reporters “whoever wins AI, wins”.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

After apocalyptic warnings about the threats posed by AI, leaders like Sam Altman and Elon Musk backed Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s calls to ‘slow the pace’.

F acing a public objections over Anthropic researchers’ repeated warnings that artificial intelligence could kill all of humanity by 2030, the AI company’s CEO, Dario Amodei, issued a proposal at the weekend to slow down the technology’s advancement to ensure public safety.

In a display of unity, the heads of the largest US artificial intelligence companies all agreed at once.

The OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis and xAI owner Elon Musk posted support for Amodei’s proposal for slowing AI development, titled “We Must Pace the Frontier,” with Altman stating he would match Amodei’s commitment to embedding outside evaluators within his company to verify safety practices.

The AI CEOs’ warnings and promises open up a host of questions about how AI might be regulated, what risks it poses and whether the industry will slow down the fevered race to advance its technology. While lawmakers and the tech industry consider how to address fear and distrust of AI, many of the hurdles impeding comprehensive AI regulation remain the same as before last week’s apocalyptic declarations from a young Anthropic researcher.

The US federal government is committed to a global AI arms race.

Anthropic and OpenAI did not at once respond to a request for comment.

On Sunday, Trump once again rejected calls for slowing down AI development while citing competition from China and reporters “whoever wins AI, wins”.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 7.3 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Technology)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentGenderHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Technology)as they published this story 11.4 26 65 -0.0 1.1 45.2
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Technology) 8.2 24 65 0.2 0 45.2

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works