Subscribe Sign in

Science

Uncontrolled AI could lead to 'silicon species' rivalling humans, warns Microsoft

1 min read Rewritten in plain language
Changed after publishing · 2 edits
  • the report was edited: 603 words added, 5 removed.
  • the headline was changed: Microsoft says Uncontrolled AI rival Anthropic could have 'disastrous impact' on humanitylead to 'silicon species' rivalling humans, warns Microsoft

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A3 C1 C2 D2 D3×3 D4 E3×2 F2×2 all 30 rules
  • The head of Microsoft AI has said that without adequate safeguards, the development of AI could lead to the emergence of a new "silicon species" which competes with humans.
  • Speaking to the BBC's Today programme, the chief executive said it was "right" for people to be concerned about AI, but there were "very practical things that we can do" to control it.
  • Speaking to the Today programme on Thursday, Suleyman warned against firms continuing to create AI systems capable of setting their own objectives, earning money and owning assets.
  • The Microsoft boss said greater transparency was needed around how AI systems are trained and evaluated.
  • Suleyman's comments reflect Microsoft's initial draft of its Humanist AI Code of Conduct, external, a "training manual" published on Monday for how the company is developing its AI, which sets out the idea of "humanist superintelligence".

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Speaking to the Today programme on Thursday, Suleyman warned against firms continuing to create AI systems capable of setting their own objectives, earning money and owning assets.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

One of the three things this headline claims did not turn up in the report.

  • “Uncontrolled” is named in the headline. We could not find it in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. Names are matched as they are spelled, so a report that says “New South Wales” where the headline says “NSW” is queried here when it should not be. How this is checked

The head of Microsoft AI has said that without adequate safeguards, the development of AI could lead to the emergence of a new "silicon species" which competes with humans.

Mustafa Suleyman said rival firm Anthropic is treating AI like it is human, an approach he called "misguided" which could create technology that humanity cannot control.

Speaking to the BBC's Today programme, the chief executive said it was "right" for people to be concerned about AI, but there were "very practical things that we can do" to control it.

OpenAI boss says world 'right to be afraid' but should trust AI firms.

Speaking to the Today programme on Thursday, Suleyman warned against firms continuing to create AI systems capable of setting their own objectives, earning money and owning assets.

Suleyman's comments to the BBC follow an essay he published earlier this week, external, in which he questioned Anthropic's approach to training its AI model Claude, despite praising boss Dario Amodei and his team as "intellectually honest people".

The Microsoft boss said greater transparency was needed around how AI systems are trained and evaluated.

Dame Wendy Hall, professor of Computer Science at the University of Southampton, described the comments as "the sort of conversation we need to be having internationally", contrasting it with the "histrionics" from some AI companies which she said only served to "scare everyone".

Suleyman's comments reflect Microsoft's initial draft of its Humanist AI Code of Conduct, external, a "training manual" published on Monday for how the company is developing its AI, which sets out the idea of "humanist superintelligence".

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 1.8 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is BBC News (Technology)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
BBC News (Technology)as they published this story 7.2 9 78 -0.1 49.2
Mundane Readneutralized from BBC News (Technology) 5.1 8 78 0 49.2

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works