Subscribe Sign in

Politics

Top AI execs met with federal ministers as copyright proposal leaked

ABC News
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceGovernment Policy

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 C1×2 D2×4 D3×2 D4×3 E3×2 E4×2 F2 all 30 rules
  • Senior executives from OpenAI and Anthropic were meeting with federal ministers just as its proposals to rewrite copyright law for AI leaked to the public.
  • AI companies have said Australia's copyright government is a sticking point over plans to invest here.
  • A spokesperson for Attorney-General Michelle Rowland told the ABC on Tuesday the government was consulting creators, media organisations and AI companies about options intended to give creators control and fair payment.
  • In a submission to the government's AI inquiry released today, OpenAI explicitly stated that Australia's copyright settings were a factor in its plans to grow its Australian presence.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Senior executives from OpenAI and Anthropic were meeting with federal ministers just as its proposals to rewrite copyright law for AI leaked to the public.

The Albanese government has been trying to thread the needle of enticing AI companies to grow their investment in Australia, while also addressing concerns about the risk and harms associated with the AI boom.

AI companies have said Australia's copyright government is a sticking point over plans to invest here.

Earlier this week, senior ministers met with senior US executives of the two top AI companies, Anthropic's special international envoy, Jeffrey Bleich, and OpenAI's vice president of global policy, Ann O'Leary, amid their push for an Australian expansion.

After ruling out a broad exemption for AI companies to train their models on copyrighted materials in Australia late last year, the ABC revealed yesterday the government held secret consultations earlier this month that would pave the way for AI companies to train their models in Australia.

Under one option, AI companies could gain permission after striking a minimum number of deals with rights holders, without paying other creators whose work they used.

A spokesperson for Attorney-General Michelle Rowland told the ABC on Tuesday the government was consulting creators, media organisations and AI companies about options intended to give creators control and fair payment.

OpenAI also confirmed on Tuesday it was participating in the consultations and said it was committed to working constructively with the government, creators and industry.

In a submission to the government's AI inquiry released today, OpenAI explicitly stated that Australia's copyright settings were a factor in its plans to grow its Australian presence.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 8.6 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentGenderHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 14.6 13 66 -0.4 3.7 42.6
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 8.7 11 66 -0.3 0 52

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works