Subscribe Sign in

Science

Al Gore says the real AI risk isn’t data centers — it’s what industry leaders are warning about

TechCrunch
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceClimateAI Data CenterAl GoreExclusive

Show what we removed Rules applied: A2 A3×3 A6 C1 C2 D1 D2×2 D3×6 E3×2 F2×6 all 30 rules
  • In an interview with TechCrunch this week alongside Lila Preston, co-head of growth equity at their investment firm Generation Investment Management, Gore said emissions from AI data centers aren’t what should keep people up at night, despite the opposition over their environmental impacts.
  • Gore isn’t dismissive of concerns about how these data centers are being powered.
  • We also pressed Gore on the wave of warnings from AI industry leaders that has dominated headlines over the last week.

3 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Pacific Northwest National Laboratories researchers library picture
Not from this story. A library photograph of laboratory research, used to illustrate it. Pacific Northwest National Laboratories researchers rawpixel, CC0

Al Gore has spent more than two decades as one of the most recognizable voices in the climate movement, so when he talks about AI, it’s worth paying attention to what he considers scary.

In an interview with TechCrunch this week alongside Lila Preston, co-head of growth equity at their investment firm Generation Investment Management, Gore said emissions from AI data centers aren’t what should keep people up at night, despite the opposition over their environmental impacts. What should concern people more, in his view, are the warnings coming from inside the AI industry itself, and he takes them seriously.

Gore isn’t dismissive of concerns about how these data centers are being powered.

In fact, Gore thinks the public opposition at planning-commission meetings has less to do with carbon emissions than with anxiety over automation upending society in the not-too-distant future.

We also pressed Gore on the wave of warnings from AI industry leaders that has dominated headlines over the last week.

Gore being Gore (he often reaches for literature, Scripture, and pop philosophy to make a point), he invoked Maya Angelou’s well-known line: “When someone tells you who they are, believe them the first time.”

Part of what’s changed his calculus, he said, is recent, concrete behavior from AI systems themselves — pointing to “the recent example of models escaping confinement, collaborating secretly, covering their tracks, engaging in deceptive behavior,” and noting that Anthropic has said it stopped instances of Claude being used to help develop biological weapons in different countries.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 8.1 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is TechCrunch's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
TechCrunchas they published this story 12.9 16 67 -0.3 31.6
Mundane Readneutralized from TechCrunch 11.5 16 67 -0.2 31.6

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works