World No 9 returns to form in 6-3, 6-3 win against Kamil Majchrzak.
The world No 9 found top gear on Sunday at Pat Rafter Arena, beating Kamil Majchrzak 6-3, 6-3 to clinch a 3-1 result that sends Australia into the Cup’s penultimate round next year.
The pair’s 7-6, 6-3 defeat of Jan Zielinski and Karol Drzewiecki followed the win and the loss posted in singles by De Minaur and James Duckworth respectively on Saturday.
3 sentences from our version of the report,
chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below.
How
Summarized version
Earlier, Max Purcell’s scintillating tiebreak tennis alongside rock-solid Rinky Hijikata swung their doubles match in Australia’s favour.
Headline check
All three things this headline claims are in the report.
Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked
The article, shortened and in plain language
World No 9 returns to form in 6-3, 6-3 win against Kamil Majchrzak.
Alex de Minaur has returned to form to seal Australia’s Davis Cup progression, with the hosts beating Poland 3-1 in Brisbane also thanks to some earlier doubles brilliance.
The world No 9 found top gear on Sunday at Pat Rafter Arena, beating Kamil Majchrzak 6-3, 6-3 to clinch a 3-1 result that sends Australia into the Cup’s penultimate round next year.
With his backhand and serve firing, De Minaur followed up his 57-minute annihilation of Maks Kasnikowski on Saturday with another therapeutic response to a disappointing second-round US Open exit earlier this month.
The pair’s 7-6, 6-3 defeat of Jan Zielinski and Karol Drzewiecki followed the win and the loss posted in singles by De Minaur and James Duckworth respectively on Saturday.
Shortened to 1 minute
of reading, this version reads 9.4 on the Niral Score.
You are reading our version, not theirs.
This is The Guardian Australia (Sport)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with
verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives
that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations
are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure
this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.
How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it
No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.
Readers can ask a question about this story here.
Questions and answers are for subscribers.
Sign in
to read them.
Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look.
Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason,
so the decision can be looked at again. How this works