Subscribe Sign in

Politics / Germany

Apple will let EU apps use less-alarming tracking-consent screens

TechCrunch
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

AppsGovernment and PolicyApp Tracking TransparencyAppleEuropean Union

Show what we removed Rules applied: D2 D3×6 F2×3 all 30 rules
  • As a result of a multi-year antitrust probe by Germany’s federal competition regulator and others, Apple has agreed to change the requirements for apps on its platforms that ask for consent to track the user across other apps or websites.
  • Users typically respond to consent screens by asking apps not to track them like Meta, while boosting Apple’s own.

2 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

As a result of a multi-year antitrust probe by Germany’s federal competition regulator and others, Apple has agreed to change the requirements for apps on its platforms that ask for consent to track the user across other apps or websites.

Regulators said this system, known as App Tracking Transparency, or ATT, had favored Apple over third-party apps, since Apple allows its own apps to use consumers’ data from its ecosystem without needing a consent screen.

Instead, they allow app developers whose software is distributed in the EU to display an alternative consent screen that includes modified formatting, language, and the option to link out to “additional information” about why the app is requesting this permission, among other things.

Apple’s compliance involves over half-a-dozen changes that attempt to make these ATT consent screens less scary to end users.

Users typically respond to consent screens by asking apps not to track them like Meta, while boosting Apple’s own.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 7.8 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is TechCrunch's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingHappiness
TechCrunchas they published this story 8.2 7 58 51.1
Mundane Readneutralized from TechCrunch 8.2 7 58 51.1

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works