Subscribe Sign in

Politics / United States

AUKUS felt 'too hard' at times, former White House official says

ABC News
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Defence ForcesNational Security

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×3 A3×2 D2×3 D3×5 E3×13 F2×2 all 30 rules
  • Former top defence officials from Australia, the US, and the UK have assessed the state of the AUKUS pact five years after it was announced.
  • Former US deputy secretary of state Kurt Campbell, Australia's former defence secretary Greg Moriarty and former UK national security adviser Sir Stephen Lovegrove all said they were content with what had been achieved so far.
  • For years, US shipyards have been building the boats far too slowly to maintain the American fleet at target levels.
  • In Australia, Mr Moriarty said, skills shortages remained an obstacle.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

They also conceded AUKUS still faced challenges, about workforce shortages and submarine construction delays.

Headline check

One of the two things this headline claims is not in the report.

  • The headline puts “too hard” in quotation marks. Nobody says those words anywhere in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Former top defence officials from Australia, the US, and the UK have assessed the state of the AUKUS pact five years after it was announced.

The pact aims to arm Australia with nuclear-powered submarines, but the slow pace of submarine construction in the US has long been a concern.

AUKUS has forced the United States to confront its "profoundly lacking" capacity to build and maintain naval submarines, but recent progress should inspire confidence in the defence deal, a former top White House official says.

Five years after the pact between Australia, the US and the UK was announced, three of its architects have assessed its progress towards its goals, which include arming Australia with nuclear-powered submarines to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific.

Former US deputy secretary of state Kurt Campbell, Australia's former defence secretary Greg Moriarty and former UK national security adviser Sir Stephen Lovegrove all said they were content with what had been achieved so far.

One question that has persistently dogged AUKUS is whether the US can deliver on its plan to transfer several Virginia-class submarines to Australia by the 2030s.

For years, US shipyards have been building the boats far too slowly to maintain the American fleet at target levels.

"In many respects, it was lacking in the ability to get subs under repair, back out at sea, to be able to turn out new submarines."

The US is investing heavily to improve the rate of construction, and Australia is contributing more than $4 billion to the effort.

In Australia, Mr Moriarty said, skills shortages remained an obstacle.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 5 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 7.5 8 78 0.2 51.9
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 5.1 5 78 0.2 51.9

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works