Josh Inglis scored his second one-day international century and Nathan Ellis his highest score in the format with an unbeaten 36 from 44 balls as Australia claimed a one-wicket victory over hosts Zimbabwe with a ball to spare in Harare on Sunday.
Australia claimed the series 3-0 and now move on to South Africa for three ODI fixtures that begin in Durban on Thursday.
2 sentences from our version of the report,
chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below.
How
Summarized version
After the home side elected to bat first, Zimbabwe’s innings was anchored by an unbeaten 81 from 72 balls by their captain, Sikandar Raza, to go with half-centuries for Craig Ervine and Innocent Kaia. Inglis scored a 103 from 102 balls as he struck 11 fours, with the next highest scorer Ellis on his unbeaten 36.
Headline check
All two things this headline claims are in the report.
Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked
The article, shortened and in plain language
Josh Inglis scored his second one-day international century and Nathan Ellis his highest score in the format with an unbeaten 36 from 44 balls as Australia claimed a one-wicket victory over hosts Zimbabwe with a ball to spare in Harare on Sunday.
When Ellis was joined at the crease by Australia’s No 11, Spencer Johnson, the tourists needed 27 runs for victory, something the pair managed at a run-a-ball to take their side to the win.
Australia claimed the series 3-0 and now move on to South Africa for three ODI fixtures that begin in Durban on Thursday.
After the home side elected to bat first, Zimbabwe’s innings was anchored by an unbeaten 81 from 72 balls by their captain, Sikandar Raza, to go with half-centuries for Craig Ervine and Innocent Kaia.
Shortened to 1 minute
of reading, this version reads 3.6 on the Niral Score.
You are reading our version, not theirs.
This is The Guardian Australia (Sport)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with
verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives
that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations
are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure
this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.
How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it
No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.
Readers can ask a question about this story here.
Questions and answers are for subscribers.
Sign in
to read them.
Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look.
Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason,
so the decision can be looked at again. How this works
