the headline was changed:
Australia news live: Pocock calls for AI safety act after Medicare breach retrial date set in Yung Filly rape case– as it happened
the headline was changed:
Australia news live: PM says he learned of OpenAI’s Pocock calls for AI safety act after Medicare breach; in New York; retrial date set in Yung Filly rape case
the headline was changed:
Australia news live: PM says he learned of OpenAI’s Medicare breach in New York; Australian shares on track for fourth straight losing weekretrial date set in Yung Filly rape case
the headline was changed:
Australia news live: PM says he learned of OpenAI’s Medicare breach in New York; NSW renters to benefit from new lawsAustralian shares on track for fourth straight losing week
the headline was changed:
Australia news live: Angus Taylor accuses PM of ‘swanning around’ at UN instead says he learned of making fuel cheaper; OpenAI’s Medicare breach in New York; NSW renters to benefit from new laws
Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep
what we saw the first time.
The opposition’s defence spokesperson, James Paterson, has questioned the timing of the prime minister’s announcement that an AI agent hacked Medicare.
Paterson told 7.30 he believed Albanese had chosen to make the announcement at the UN summit in New York, as part of his effort to stand up to “big tech” on AI.
I don’t think it was a coincidence.
Paterson said he didn’t consider the breach to be overly serious because the data the AI agent accessed was made freely available to researchers and academics studying the health system, and was not personal or private in nature.
4 sentences from our version of the report,
chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below.
How
The one thing this headline claims is in the report.
Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked
Full article, in plain language
The opposition’s defence spokesperson, James Paterson, has questioned the timing of the prime minister’s announcement that an AI agent hacked Medicare.
Paterson made the claim on the ABC’s 7.30 program last night after Anthony Albanese publicly said that an AI agent developed by OpenAI hacked Medicare in June and that the tech giant only notified the government earlier this month using an email sent to a “public mailbox”.
Paterson told 7.30 he believed Albanese had chosen to make the announcement at the UN summit in New York, as part of his effort to stand up to “big tech” on AI.
The government has questions to answer about when they knew and … why the prime minister decided to disclose it in the way he did in the place he did at the time he did. But in terms of the nature of the potential of actual security breach this is the bottom end of the spectrum of seriousness.
I don’t think it was a coincidence. It neatly dove-tailed with the political agenda the prime minister has in New York City.
Paterson said he didn’t consider the breach to be overly serious because the data the AI agent accessed was made freely available to researchers and academics studying the health system, and was not personal or private in nature.
He said the breach was cause for “being alert but not alarmed”.
Nevertheless, he said Australians were “entitled to demand explanations and contrition” and to want high levels of confidence when entering into agreements with big tech companies such as OpenAI.
You are reading our version, not theirs.
This is The Guardian Australia (Business)'s report with its
verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives
that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations
are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure
this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.
How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it
No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.
Readers can ask a question about this story here.
Questions and answers are for subscribers.
Sign in
to read them.
Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look.
Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason,
so the decision can be looked at again. How this works