Subscribe Sign in

Culture

Automattic’s interim CEO and legal chief signed reciprocal severance deals during Mullenweg’s brief ouster

TechCrunch
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

AppsMedia and EntertainmentAutomatticExclusiveMatt Mullenweg

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×3 A3×3 C5 D2×7 D3×8 D4×2 E3 F2×3 all 30 rules
  • Last week, on September 9, Automattic’s board voted to put CEO Matt Mullenweg on paid leave, a decision the board still hasn’t explained publicly.
  • Davies and Chief Legal Officer Andy Missan, each signed the other’s severance agreement, effective September 10.
  • (The company replaced its earlier counsel, Gibson Dunn, with Stephen Shackelford and Shawn J. Rabin of Susman Godfrey LLP, the company and Mullenweg jointly announced on Wednesday.

3 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Davies and Chief Legal Officer Andy Missan, each signed the other’s severance agreement, effective September 10. Between the two of them, the full package comes out to $8.15 million that Automattic would now owe both executives.

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Last week, on September 9, Automattic’s board voted to put CEO Matt Mullenweg on paid leave, a decision the board still hasn’t explained publicly. Mullenweg, in a company-wide Slack message, accused CFO Mark Davies of “conspiring” with three board members behind his back to force the vote through, saying he was given only 50 minutes’ notice and was denied time to have the resolution reviewed by outside legal counsel.

In the 33-hour window between Mullenweg being put on leave and his return, two executives at the company signed off on exit packages for each other. Davies and Chief Legal Officer Andy Missan, each signed the other’s severance agreement, effective September 10.

Between the two of them, the full package comes out to $8.15 million that Automattic would now owe both executives, since Mullenweg fired them upon his return.

(The company replaced its earlier counsel, Gibson Dunn, with Stephen Shackelford and Shawn J. Rabin of Susman Godfrey LLP, the company and Mullenweg jointly announced on Wednesday.

In Davies’ case, the agreement also specifies that his removal from the interim CEO role won’t count as “Good Reason” — a legal term that normally lets an executive resign and still collect severance, on the grounds that their job conditions changed for the worse — as long as he remains CFO. While that clause itself is not strange for a legal agreement, it suggests the document was drafted with Davies’ precise circumstances in mind —becoming interim CEO — effectively ensuring Automattic won’t owe him severance once his temporary CEO stint ends, as he can’t claim that alone as a reason to resign.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 6.6 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is TechCrunch's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
TechCrunchas they published this story 11.3 20 50 -0.0 57.5
Mundane Readneutralized from TechCrunch 9.7 17 50 -0.3 57.5

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works