Subscribe Sign in

Sport / Melbourne, VIC

Swans make ‘best and fairest’ call on banned players

The Age
Summary

SportAFL

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: Banned Swans eligible to win make ‘best and fairest’ but won’t be there to accept it if they docall on banned players

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

The Swans have opted against scrubbing any of their five suspended players from claiming the club’s best and fairest award.

AFL Sydney vs Essendon 2009-Jolly & Ryder Ruck
AFL Sydney vs Essendon 2009-Jolly & Ryder Ruck Wikimedia Commons, Public domain

This is a summary. The indicators are not. The scores were measured over this summary alone, which is less of the article than we would like and makes them less certain.

How outlets headlined it

Each outlet's own headline. Struck through: the loaded words our version leaves out. Plainest first.

  • The Age Swans make ‘best and fairest’ call on banned players plain
  • The West Australian Suspended Swans in running for club best-and-fairest plain

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Also covered by Brisbane Times, The Sydney Morning Herald, WAtoday, The West Australian. We hold only their summary of it, not the report, so there is nothing of theirs to measure here.

Outlet Niral Score
The Ageas they published this story 14

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works

The same event elsewhere

4 other outlets filed this story. The scoreboard above is what they did differently.