Subscribe Sign in

Sport / Brisbane, QLD

Brisbane to appeal Lachie Neale’s ban in bid to play AFL grand final

The Guardian Australia (Sport)
2 min read Rewritten in plain language

Brisbane LionsAFLSport

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: Brisbane’s Brisbane to appeal Lachie Neale Neale’s ban in desperate bid to miss play AFL grand finalas AFL’s one-game ban upheld

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A3 C1 D2×4 D3×7 D4 F2×2 all 30 rules
  • The prospect of Brisbane Lions’ midfielder Lachie Neale playing in Saturday’s AFL grand final has plummeted after his suspension for striking Hawthorn’s Jack Ginnivan in last week’s preliminary final was upheld by the AFL tribunal.
  • The Lions may still appeal the verdict, however, in a last ditch bid to have Neale take the field in Saturday’s season decider against Fremantle.
  • Gleeson delivered the verdict at 9.40pm on Tuesday night.
  • The first quarter incident was behind play, and Neale explained earlier in the evening he approached Ginnivan after a physical confrontation between the Hawks player and Hipwood.
  • Challenging the verdict would see Neale face the AFL appeal board in a 11th-hour bid to secure a favourable outcome, adding another storyline to the traditional buzz of grand final week.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

Headline as published: Brisbane to appeal Lachie Neale’s ban in desperate bid to play AFL grand final

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report2 min

Dual Brownlow medallist guilty of intentional striking

Plea of ‘exceptional circumstances’ rejected

The prospect of Brisbane Lions’ midfielder Lachie Neale playing in Saturday’s AFL grand final has plummeted after his suspension for striking Hawthorn’s Jack Ginnivan in last week’s preliminary final was upheld by the AFL tribunal.

The two-time Brownlow medallist had never been suspended across 320 matches, but he failed to argue his record warranted this week’s ban be set aside due to the so-called exceptional and compelling circumstances afforded to Collingwood’s Scott Pendlebury earlier this year.

The Lions may still appeal the verdict, however, in a last ditch bid to have Neale take the field in Saturday’s season decider against Fremantle.

After more than two hours of submissions and another two hours of deliberations by tribunal chair Jeff Gleeson, and members Darren Gaspar and Scott Stevens, the tribunal found the 33-year-old had struck the Hawthorn small forward intentionally and with medium impact.

Gleeson delivered the verdict at 9.40pm on Tuesday night. “In the end, Neale delivered an intentional strike off the ball to an unsuspecting opponent,” he said.

“To use the language that has been used more than once this evening, Neale intended to strike him in the guts for the way he behaved towards [Neale’s teammate Eric] Hipwood, and he did strike him in the guts.

“Even Neale’s outstanding record does not render a one-match suspension for that act inappropriate or unreasonable.”

The first quarter incident was behind play, and Neale explained earlier in the evening he approached Ginnivan after a physical confrontation between the Hawks player and Hipwood.

“I was very close to the incident between Jack and Eric Hipwood, where it seemed like Jack was on top of Eric and gave him a couple of jumper punches and got up and started to move along,” Neale said.

“I didn’t feel like that looked great, so I went to show my disappointment, I suppose, in that action.”

He argued, however, that rather than strike Ginnivan, his act was more of a “bump or body check”.

The AFL upgraded the penalty for such behaviour in 2026 in an enforcement action on off-the-ball incidents.

Challenging the verdict would see Neale face the AFL appeal board in a 11th-hour bid to secure a favourable outcome, adding another storyline to the traditional buzz of grand final week. The Lions have until midday Wednesday to lodge their appeal.

New evidence is generally not allowable at the appeal board stage, meaning the club would be relying on clearing a high legal bar to have Neale take the field.

If Neale does escape a ban, Saturday could be his final match for the club he has captained to two premierships, against the side who drafted him in 2011. Speculation has linked the out of contract veteran with an off-season move to Victoria.

Or, more likely, Neale has already played his last of 185 matches in Lions colours.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Sport)'s report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How outlets headlined it

Each outlet's own headline. Struck through: the loaded words our version leaves out. Plainest first.

  • WAtoday Lachie Neale arrives in Melbourne with a grand final suspension hanging over his head plain
  • The West Australian AFL grand final: Brisbane Lions confirm they will appeal Lachie Neale tribunal result after suspension upheld plain
  • The West Australian AFL Grand Final: Lachie Neale ‘really disappointed’ as Brisbane Lions eye last-ditch appeal plain
  • The West Australian Lachie Neale: Brisbane star addresses grand final suspension for first time as Lions touch down in Melbourne plain
  • The Guardian Australia (Sport) Brisbane to appeal Lachie Neale’s ban in desperate bid to play AFL grand final 1 change

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Also covered by WAtoday, The Age, Brisbane Times, The Sydney Morning Herald, The West Australian. We hold only their summary of it, not the report, so there is nothing of theirs to measure here.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Sport)as they published this story 14.8 10 41 -0.2 39
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Sport) 9.2 8 41 0.2 47

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works

The same event elsewhere

7 other outlets filed this story. The scoreboard above is what they did differently.