Subscribe Sign in

Politics / United States

CNN, MS NOW and Politico sue over White House ban

ABC News
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Journalism

Changed after publishing · 4 edits
  • the headline was changed: Media outlets CNN, MS NOW and Politico sue Trump, US networks stop TV pool coverage in solidarityover White House ban
  • the headline was changed: CNN, MS NOW and Politico Media outlets sue over White House banTrump, US networks stop TV pool coverage in solidarity
  • the headline was changed: CNN, MS NOW and Politico to sue over White House ban
  • the headline was changed: CNN, MS NOW and Politico to sue after being barred from over White House ban

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×3 A3 C2 D2 D3×2 E3×2 F2×2 all 30 rules
  • CNN, MS NOW and Politico say they have told Donald Trump's administration that they are filing a lawsuit over being denied White House access.
  • White House Correspondents' Association president Jacqui Heinrich called on the Trump administration to at once restore access.
  • Soon after, Politico said its White House reporter Cheyenne Haslett was also denied entry and had her badge confiscated.

3 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

CNN, MS NOW and Politico say they have told Donald Trump's administration that they are filing a lawsuit over being denied White House access.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

CNN, MS NOW and Politico say they have told Donald Trump's administration that they are filing a lawsuit over being denied White House access.

Reporters from the three news organisations were blocked from the White House on Saturday, local time, a day after Mr Trump said he was barring them because of reporting he found to be "fake news".

"Without notice or process, the White House revoked our journalists' credentials because it objected to our reporting," the outlets said in a joint statement posted on X on Monday.

All three had before hinted at legal action.

White House Correspondents' Association president Jacqui Heinrich called on the Trump administration to at once restore access.

On Friday, local time, Mr Trump said he would ban all three outlets because of coverage he disliked.

White House reporters from the two cable networks went live to report they had been turned away, their press badges deactivated, when arriving for their jobs at the White House on Saturday.

Soon after, Politico said its White House reporter Cheyenne Haslett was also denied entry and had her badge confiscated.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 2.3 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 9.4 5 66 -0.5 48.3
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 5.5 2 66 -0.3 48.3

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works