Subscribe Sign in

Business

Converse apologizes and pulls ad that critics said evoked racist imagery

2 min read Rewritten in plain language

AdvertisingNikeRaceBusinessFashion

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 C1×3 C2×2 D2×2 D3×7 all 30 rules
  • Sneaker company removes social media ad after opposition from critics who said it resembled KKK imagery
  • The Instagram ad photo showed K-pop singer Karina wearing a skirt and holding a pair of Chuck 70 X sneakers.
  • Converse, based in Boston, declined on Sunday to answer questions seeking additional information, including how the company screens ads before they are posted and how the ad was approved.
  • In August, retailer Target pulled a children’s Halloween costume from its shelves after social media opposition, apologizing for selling a garment that critics said evoked racist minstrel caricatures.
  • Converse, founded in Malden, Massachusetts, in 1908, makes the Chuck Taylor All Star sneaker.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

It was first released in 1917 as a non-skid basketball shoe, adding the signature of Taylor in 1934, according to the company’s website.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report2 min

Sneaker company removes social media ad after opposition from critics who said it resembled KKK imagery

The sneaker company Converse has removed a social media ad that sparked objections among critics who viewed it as evoking the Ku Klux Klan and lynching.

The Instagram ad photo showed K-pop singer Karina wearing a skirt and holding a pair of Chuck 70 X sneakers. Critics criticized out online, saying that a white triangular image created by lighting on the skirt resembled a KKK hood – and that the way she held the sneakers made them look like the dangling feet of a lynching victim.

Converse, owned by Nike, issued a statement apologizing and saying it removed the ad.

“We’re sorry,” said the statement, first released on Friday. “We understand why this image is deeply upsetting and recognize that we got this wrong. We removed it from our channels and are working to remove it everywhere it appeared. This should not have happened and we will do better.”

Converse, based in Boston, declined on Sunday to answer questions seeking additional information, including how the company screens ads before they are posted and how the ad was approved.

Karina and her management company, SM Entertainment Group, did not immediately respond to messages through their Instagram accounts.

Retailers and top fashion brands have issued a string of apologies over the years for products criticized as being racially insensitive.

In August, retailer Target pulled a children’s Halloween costume from its shelves after social media opposition, apologizing for selling a garment that critics said evoked racist minstrel caricatures.

The Converse photo preceded swift criticism, including calls for staff involved in the ad to be fired and for a boycott of the company. In a slew of comments on social media, posters questioned how the ad could have cleared the company’s advertising vetting process. Other commenters defended Converse, saying they didn’t believe it was intentional.

Lee Merritt, a Texas-based civil rights attorney, posted on Instagram that Converse’s apology “doesn’t undo what got past legal, marketing and leadership at every step”.

“We keep having this conversation because corporations keep failing the same test,” he wrote. “Do better means catching this before it airs – not after we’re offended.”

Converse, founded in Malden, Massachusetts, in 1908, makes the Chuck Taylor All Star sneaker. It was first released in 1917 as a non-skid basketball shoe, adding the signature of Taylor – a basketball player who promoted the sneaker – in 1934, according to the company’s website.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Business)'s report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Business)as they published this story 14.3 7 62 -1.1 51.2
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Business) 6.4 6 62 -0.3 59.2

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works