Subscribe Sign in

Politics / Israel

Crossbench MPs launch push to stop Australian military exports being used in human rights breaches

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

PoliticsAustralian Foreign PolicyIsrael Gaza WarArms TradeDavid Pocock

Show what we removed Rules applied: C6 D2×2 D3×6 E3 F2 all 30 rules
  • Crossbench MPs including David Pocock and Sophie Scamps will put pressure on the Albanese government to ban Australian goods from being used by the Israeli military by introducing a bill designed to force it to adhere to international obligations.
  • The defence minister, Richard Marles, has accused critics of “misinformation” and said Australia has contributed to program for decades as part of a multi-lateral agreement with Lockheed Martin in the US, rather than with Israel directly.
  • The bills are backed by international law advocates and experts including the former president of the Australian Human Rights Commission, Gillian Triggs, and the executive director of the Australian Centre for International Justice, Rawan Arraf.

3 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

‘Red lines’ legislation would forbid defence equipment technology or services being used, includes parts for F-35 fighter jets.

Crossbench MPs including David Pocock and Sophie Scamps will put pressure on the Albanese government to ban Australian goods from being used by the Israeli military by introducing a bill designed to force it to adhere to international obligations.

The foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, has before described Australia’s contributions to the F-35 supply chain as “ non-lethal in nature ”. The defence minister, Richard Marles, has accused critics of “misinformation” and said Australia has contributed to program for decades as part of a multi-lateral agreement with Lockheed Martin in the US, rather than with Israel directly.

The crossbench group – who also include the Greens and the independents Lidia Thorpe, Andrew Wilkie and Fatima Payman – say their bill could also prevent companies and institutions investing in activities connected to illegal settlements and serious international law violations.

The proponents of the laws say they would put Australia’s legislation in line with its international human rights obligations and establish an independent anti-genocide commissioner.

The bills are backed by international law advocates and experts including the former president of the Australian Human Rights Commission, Gillian Triggs, and the executive director of the Australian Centre for International Justice, Rawan Arraf.

Thorpe said the bill – to be concurrently introduced in the house and Senate this week – was about upholding fundamental human rights that the government “is already committed to under international law”.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 6.3 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Business)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Business)as they published this story 12.4 4 67 -0.1 14
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Business) 12.4 4 67 -0.1 14

Sign in to react.

This story is about a death. Comments are closed on those, because the people closest to it are among the people who read them. If something here is wrong, tell us — that we do read.