Subscribe Sign in

World

Does the sight of small holes make you feel ill? There's a reason for that

4 min read Rewritten in plain language

ScienceHealth

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×4 A2 A3×6 A4×2 A7 D2×12 D3×11 D4 E3×6 F2×9 all 30 rules
  • Imagine you’re scrolling through TikTok and come across an image of a lotus seed pod or sponge.
  • Despite the "phobia" in its name, trypophobia is not a "fear of holes".
  • For most people with trypophobia these reactions are mild and can include disgust, nausea, skin crawling sensation, fear and anxiety.
  • Media stories, TikTok videos and online communities helped make trypophobia mainstream.
  • Simone Hain is a Research Psychologist at University of Technology Sydney; Macquarie University.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Unlike many phobias, disgust is often the more dominant emotion.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report4 min

Imagine you’re scrolling through TikTok and come across an image of a lotus seed pod or sponge.

You might not think much about it, but some people instantly feel sick. Their skin crawls, they feel nauseous, disgusted or uncomfortable, and quickly swipe away.

The object is harmless. So why does it trigger such a strong reaction?

This reaction is known as trypophobia, an aversion to clusters of holes or circular patterns.

About one in six people have at least some degree of discomfort when seeing these patterns.

Despite the "phobia" in its name, trypophobia is not a "fear of holes". It is also not recognised as a standalone mental health disorder. Unlike many phobias, disgust (than fear) is often the more dominant emotion.

Common triggers are lotus seed pods and honeycomb, or even everyday objects such as sponges, crumpets, bubbles, aerated chocolate or strawberries.

For most people with trypophobia these reactions are mild and can include disgust, nausea, skin crawling sensation, fear and anxiety.

But for a small group, symptoms can become so distressing they lead to people avoiding particular images, objects, or situations. This is a level of avoidance usually seen in specific phobias, such as arachnophobia, a fear of spiders.

In my own research, some participants avoided strawberries, cooking or baking, clothing, and even showers because of trypophobia-related triggers. These examples show trypophobia can sometimes affect a person’s life.

The short answer is social media. Media stories, TikTok videos and online communities helped make trypophobia mainstream.

Shared images are often digitally altered to maximise discomfort and provoke strong reactions.

Research also suggests social media might influence how people experience trypophobia. For instance, in one 2024 study, almost two-thirds of people heard about it through social media. Those who had previously heard of trypophobia reported stronger reactions than those who had not.

But that doesn’t mean social media created trypophobia. Around one-quarter of people with trypophobia in the same study had never heard of it. Social media might increase awareness, but it cannot explain why some people react so strongly in the first place.

Scientists still debate why trypophobia exists, with two leading explanations emerging.

The first is the threat-detection theory. Some researchers argue trypophobic images resemble patterns found on poisonous animals, such as snakes. According to this theory, humans might have evolved to react negatively to these visual cues because they can signal danger.

The second theory focuses on avoiding disease, with support from increasing evidence. Clusters of holes can look like skin lesions, rashes, parasites or signs of infection. Although lotus seed pods or honeycomb are harmless, the visual resemblance might activate psychological systems that evolved to help us avoid contamination and disease.

Both theories suggest trypophobic patterns might resemble things that posed a threat to human health or survival. In other words, the holes themselves might not be the problem. Instead, the brain might interpret these patterns as signs of a biological threat.

What people react to is not the object itself, but what the brain subconsciously thinks the pattern might represent. This might explain why harmless objects can trigger reactions that seem far stronger than the situation warrants.

Fortunately, most people only have mild symptoms and do not need treatment. Understanding that trypophobia is a recognised and common phenomenon can often be reassuring.

However, if symptoms cause distress or begin to interfere with daily life, it might be worth seeking professional support.

Even though trypophobia is often associated with disgust, many people also experience fear and anxiety. So treatments used for specific phobias, exposure-based approaches, might be helpful.

This might involve gradually and safely confronting feared or uncomfortable images, situations or sensations while reducing avoidance. Over time, people learn they can tolerate their distress and that the anticipated harm does not occur.

Until recently, no treatment had been specifically tested for trypophobia. However, a recently published study I co-authored found a single intensive treatment session targeting fear and disgust reduced symptoms and helped participants engage more in daily activities.

Trypophobia is more than an internet meme. It is a genuine psychological experience that can range from mild discomfort to distress.

Evidence suggests these patterns might activate ancient psychological systems designed to detect danger, contamination and disease. The brain could be responding as if it has detected a threat, even when there is no threat.

For most people, reactions are brief. But if not, support is available. Ask your GP for a referral to a psychologist.

Simone Hain is a Research Psychologist at University of Technology Sydney; Macquarie University.

Simone Hain does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Https://counter.theconversation.com/content/291263/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" style="border: none!important; box-shadow: none!important; margin: 0!important; max-height: 1px!important; max-width: 1px!important; min-height: 1px!important; min-width: 1px!important; opacity: 0!important; outline: none!important; padding: 0!" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" />

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is SBS News's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
SBS Newsas they published this story 23.1 38 9 -0.7 44.4
Mundane Readneutralized from SBS News 19.8 33 9 -0.7 44.4

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works