Subscribe Sign in

Europe's EU Kids Act would ban social media access for children under 13

Engadget
3 min read Rewritten in plain language

Social media

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the report was edited: 542 words added, 3 removed.

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×3 D2×13 D3 E1 F2×4 all 30 rules
  • Fifteen would be the minimum age for minors to open their own account.
  • If adopted, the law would ban social media for kids under 13 and require parental supervision for 13- and 14-year-olds.
  • Children under 13 would not be able to access social media, but would be able to use "specially designed child-friendly video-sharing services through accounts managed by their guardian," the proposal states.
  • For kids aged 13 and 14, the proposal would allow parents to set up sub-accounts that would give their kids supervised access to "age-appropriate social media and video-sharing platforms," the act states.
  • The EU has a population of around 450 million people, so the EU Kids Act would affect more users than any other social media age restriction laws, if implemented.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report3 min

Fifteen would be the minimum age for minors to open their own account.

The European Commission has introduced the EU Kids Act, the proposal yet to limit minors from accessing social media platforms. If adopted, the law would ban social media for kids under 13 and require parental supervision for 13- and 14-year-olds. Only when a child turns 15 would they be able to create their own social media accounts.

"Today, there is a robust body of evidence on the harm that social media does to a developing brain and personality, and too well parents see the effects of this," said EU Commission president Ursula Von der Leyen in a statement. "To be very clear, an age limit does not mean letting tech companies off the hook for the content of the platform. Platforms have been playing fast and loose with our children's mental health. Now we are reversing the burden of proof."

Children under 13 would not be able to access social media, but would be able to use "specially designed child-friendly video-sharing services through accounts managed by their guardian," the proposal states. Services on those "mini accounts" must be designed with safeguards like limited screen time up to one hour per day and offer adults a way to control what their kids see.

For kids aged 13 and 14, the proposal would allow parents to set up sub-accounts that would give their kids supervised access to "age-appropriate social media and video-sharing platforms," the act states. Services available on these sub-accounts would also be designed with safeguards, like limited social contact and one hour per day of screen time.

For platforms, the EU Kids Act would be among the first to force platforms to remove addictive features. Those would include recommendation algorithms that "drag minors into 'rabbit holes' of harmful contact," the Commission wrote. It would also block infinite scroll, nighttime push notifications and unsolicited contact from strangers. AI chatbots would have to be turned off by default and not be allowed to create dependency.

Age verification is another pillar, but has proved challenging to implement, as exemplified by territories like Australia. The EU would require platforms to perform such checks when someone opens a new account, and employ "reasonable proxies" like credit card details to estimate the age of current users. Apps must use age assurance tools that don't retain identity documents or biometric data, like the new EU age verification app.

Platforms would be obliged to submit compliance plans, with enforcement based on structures already in place under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA). The Commission didn't specify sanction amounts, but under the DSA, penalties can reach six percent of a company's global annual turnover. It would also include a fast-track 90-day enforcement procedure.

"Considering the clear demand for urgent and comprehensive action at Union level, it is essential that the act is adopted swiftly," the EU wrote. Its passage isn't a given, though. France's top court blocked a similar proposal, saying it infringed upon freedom of expression.

The EU has a population of around 450 million people, so the EU Kids Act would affect more users than any other social media age restriction laws, if implemented. The ban of addictive feature like recommendation algorithms would also be a new twist. Meta and other tech platforms have yet to comment, but criticism so far is mainly around the problems of age verification and duplicative legislation. "Age verification remains a technical challenge, and parallel regulation to existing laws like the Digital Services Act is problematic and unnecessary," said Bernhard Rohleder, CEO of Germany's IT industry association BITKOM.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is Engadget's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingGenderHappiness
Engadgetas they published this story 12.2 10 24 4 48.6
Mundane Readneutralized from Engadget 9.4 6 24 0 48.6

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works