Subscribe Sign in

Science

FAA tees up $875M AI tool to help manage air traffic congestion

Ars Technica
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceAI ToolsAir Traffic ControlAir Traffic ControllersAirspace

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the report was edited: 631 words added, 1 removed.

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A9 D1 D2×3 D3×14 E3×6 F2 all 30 rules
  • An AI tool is set to start advising air traffic controllers on managing air traffic in the congested airspace above the Washington, DC, area.
  • US government and industry officials told The Wall Street Journal that SMART could debut for the three airports in the Washington, DC, area as soon as Monday, September 21.
  • SMART is part of an $875 million, 12-year contract awarded to the Boston-based company Air Space Intelligence in June.

3 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

A fatal reminder came on January 29, 2025.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

An AI tool is set to start advising air traffic controllers on managing air traffic in the congested airspace above the Washington, DC, area. The expected launch would be the first step toward a planned nationwide rollout covering the 29 million square miles of US national airspace overseen by the Federal Aviation Administration.

The FAA describes the SMART system as using AI models to predict air traffic flows and identify potential conflicts based on operational factors like airline schedules, weather, airport capacity, and airspace conditions. US government and industry officials told The Wall Street Journal that SMART could debut for the three airports in the Washington, DC, area as soon as Monday, September 21.

Anonymous airline officials told Politico that their concerns only eased after the FAA said the SMART AI tool would not change any procedures for air traffic controllers or airlines, and would instead produce “alternative route information” that is made available through existing FAA systems.

SMART is part of an $875 million, 12-year contract awarded to the Boston-based company Air Space Intelligence in June.

Air Space Intelligence claims its separate Flyways AI platform already helps manage over 40 percent of all US air traffic through partnerships with customers like Alaska Airlines.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy claimed 15 to 20 air traffic controllers were retiring each day during the shutdown compared to an average of four per day, and FAA chief Bryan Bedford described the agency as losing up to 500 air traffic controller trainees during the period.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 8.1 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is Ars Technica's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
Ars Technicaas they published this story 12.3 18 55 -0.1 41
Mundane Readneutralized from Ars Technica 9.6 16 55 -0.1 46.9

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works