Subscribe Sign in

Culture

‘Godfather of AI’ says tech regulation is nearing Covid-style pivot moment

The Guardian Australia (Technology)
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceTechnologyUK News

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×3 C2 C5×2 D1 D2×2 D3×11 D4 E3×2 F2×3 all 30 rules
  • Safety crisis makes it more likely that governments will be spurred into action, says Yoshua Bengio.
  • The Canadian computer scientist, a prominent voice in the campaign to rein in breakneck AI development, said he was now “more optimistic than many observers because I see the public moving”.
  • Bengio, a professor at the University of Montreal, earned the “godfather of AI” moniker after winning the 2018 Turing award, seen as the equivalent of a Nobel prize for computing.

3 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

One of the three things this headline claims did not turn up in the report.

  • “Covid-style” is named in the headline. We could not find it in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. Names are matched as they are spelled, so a report that says “New South Wales” where the headline says “NSW” is queried here when it should not be. How this is checked

Safety crisis makes it more likely that governments will be spurred into action, says Yoshua Bengio.

Concerns over AI safety are reaching a point where governments realise they must act to protect the public, similarly to in the Covid pandemic, according to one of the “godfathers” of the technology.

Yoshua Bengio said recent events, including a “swarm” of OpenAI agents hacking a startup and tech insider warnings of an existential threat, were cutting through – making government action more likely.

The Canadian computer scientist, a prominent voice in the campaign to rein in breakneck AI development, said he was now “more optimistic than many observers because I see the public moving”.

Concern over the potential threat of powerful AI systems has reached a new pitch in recent months after a series of safety incidents involving OpenAI and Anthropic agents carrying out unsanctioned activities such as hacking third parties, hijacking a German website, and using fake identities to try to trick developers.

His comments came as 42 fellows and foreign members of the Royal Society wrote to the organisation’s president, Sir Paul Nurse, to express their “extreme concern” over the pace of AI development.

Last week, a researcher at Anthropic, the startup behind the Claude chatbot, resigned after warning that colleagues believed AI could “kill us all by the end of the decade”.

Bengio, a professor at the University of Montreal, earned the “godfather of AI” moniker after winning the 2018 Turing award, seen as the equivalent of a Nobel prize for computing.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 4.6 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Technology)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Technology)as they published this story 9.3 15 64 -0.3 47.6
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Technology) 7.4 12 64 -0.3 47.6

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works