Subscribe Sign in

Science / Victoria

Gums, ginkgos and a golden wych elm: which will win Victoria’s tree of the year?

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Trees and ForestsClimate change

Changed after publishing · 2 edits
  • the headline was changed: Gums, ginkgos and a golden wych elm: voting for which will win Victoria’s tree of the year?
  • the headline was changed: Gums, gingkos ginkgos and a golden wych elm: voting for Victoria’s tree of the year

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×6 A2×2 A3 D2×5 D3×11 F2×3 all 30 rules
  • From Carlton to Castlemaine, the National Trust of Victoria competition aims to raise awareness about trees.
  • To be eligible, the trees must be listed on the National Trust tree register000 trees in Victoria for their cultural, scientific value.
  • The ginkgo was planted in Geelong Botanic Gardens in 1859, and is more than 167 years old.
  • Voting for the competition closes at midnight, 22 October, with the winner announced on 27 October.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

From Carlton to Castlemaine, the National Trust of Victoria competition aims to raise awareness about trees.

A decades-old eucalyptus, an elm beloved by thousands of commuters, and a type of gingko once thought to be extinct in the wild are among the finalists for Victoria’s tree of the year.

To be eligible, the trees must be listed on the National Trust tree register000 trees in Victoria for their cultural, scientific value.

The executive manager of gardens at the National Trust, Justin Buckley, said the trees nominated for the registry have been there for generations, and the people who nominated them often remember playing under them and climbing them, along with their children.

Although flooded gums only naturally grow north of Newcastle, and especially in wet areas like the Daintree, this specimen most likely planted in the 1960s or 70s in Carlton North is a landmark of pride for the community.

The ginkgo was planted in Geelong Botanic Gardens in 1859, and is more than 167 years old.

Planted by 1867 Jacob Bernstein, a member of Ballarat’s Hebrew community, this Canary Island pine is the second-eldest recorded tree among the finalists and is a recognisable feature in the landscape of Ballarat.

The competition is the trust’s most successful advocacy campaign and helps bring awareness to trees in Victoria, Buckley said.

Voting for the competition closes at midnight, 22 October, with the winner announced on 27 October.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 10.4 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story 16.8 16 19 -0.3 57.2
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia 10.6 8 19 0.1 57.2

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works