Subscribe Sign in

HMRC vowed to break up with Capgemini then paid it another £4.2B

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Public Sector

Show what we removed
  • Government wants public spending to back British business, but the French supplier could remain at the tax collector until 2036.
  • The records show that HMRC paid Capgemini at least £4.2 billion across 15,726 transactions between 2014 and July 2026.
  • The arrangement accounted for about 84 percent of HMRC's technology spending between April 2006 and March 2014.
  • Yet agreements announced in August 2015 and March 2016 kept some Aspire services running beyond the contract's June 2017 end date.
  • In May 2024, HMRC awarded Capgemini another contract worth up to £245.5 million to keep legacy systems running.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

The records show that HMRC paid Capgemini at least £4.2 billion across 15,726 transactions between 2014 and July 2026.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Government wants public spending to back British business, but the French supplier could remain at the tax collector until 2036.

When Andy Burnham became Prime Minister in July, he said in his first speech that public procurement would "back British industry."

The relationship between His Majesty's Revenue & Customs and Capgemini shows the scale of that challenge.

The Register worked with Otnox to analyze HMRC's published transactions above £25,000. The records show that HMRC paid Capgemini at least £4.2 billion across 15,726 transactions between 2014 and July 2026.

Aspire began in 2004 as a ten-year contract with Capgemini as the prime supplier, but HMRC later extended it to June 2017. The arrangement accounted for about 84 percent of HMRC's technology spending between April 2006 and March 2014.

In 2016, the National Audit Office said Aspire provided stable but expensive IT systems.

When HMRC appeared before MPs in March 2015, it said it planned to replace Aspire in phases rather than extend it. Yet agreements announced in August 2015 and March 2016 kept some Aspire services running beyond the contract's June 2017 end date.

In 2020, HMRC launched its Technology Sourcing Programme, promising to open its £900 million annual IT budget to a broader range of suppliers.

In August this year, Capgemini won a £200 million, five-year contract to migrate and decommission HMRC's legacy data warehouses.

In January 2022, Capgemini signed a £51 million agreement to continue supporting tax systems developed under Aspire.

In May 2024, HMRC awarded Capgemini another contract worth up to £245.5 million to keep legacy systems running.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 6.7 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Register's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Registeras they published this story 10.4 16 56 0.1 59.3
Mundane Readneutralized from The Register 10 16 56 0.1 59.3

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works