Subscribe Sign in

Politics / Canada

How the US media's fightback will hit Donald Trump — and the legal right it's relying on

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

US PoliticsUS and Canada

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×3 A3 D2×6 D3 E3×5 F2 all 30 rules
  • Major United States media outlets from across the political divide have come together in solidarity to oppose US President Donald Trump's ban on several organisations, including CNN, from the White House.
  • On Friday, Trump announced that he was banning the three outlets from the White House grounds.
  • Trump said there was no specific incident that had prompted the ban, but warned others would follow.
  • On Monday, they announced a joint lawsuit against Trump and other administration officials, arguing that the move violated press freedom and free speech rights protected under the US constitution's First Amendment.
  • Last year, Trump banned the Associated Press from the pool of reporters that cover his movements because the news agency did not adopt his preferred name for the Gulf of Mexico.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Major United States media outlets from across the political divide have come together in solidarity to oppose US President Donald Trump's ban on several organisations, including CNN, from the White House.

Trump last week announced he was barring CNN, Politico and MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) from the White House, accusing them of spreading "fake news".

The outlets have since filed a legal challenge, arguing the ban violated the First Amendment of the US constitution, which protects free speech and press freedom.

Other outlets have now suspended pool coverage of Trump in solidarity with the banned outlets.

On Friday, Trump announced that he was banning the three outlets from the White House grounds.

Trump said on social media on Monday, without providing evidence of a national security threat.

Trump said there was no specific incident that had prompted the ban, but warned others would follow.

Within 10 minutes of Trump's announcement, CNN contacted MS NOW and Politico to discuss joint legal action, Reuters reported.

On Monday, they announced a joint lawsuit against Trump and other administration officials, arguing that the move violated press freedom and free speech rights protected under the US constitution's First Amendment.

However, vice president JD Vance rejected the suggestion they'd been banned, saying they had instead lost what he called "special access".

While the ban prohibits the outlets from the White House grounds, it does not restrict them from reporting on Trump.

Last year, Trump banned the Associated Press from the pool of reporters that cover his movements because the news agency did not adopt his preferred name for the Gulf of Mexico.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 6.9 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is SBS News (World)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingPoliticalSentimentHappiness
SBS News (World)as they published this story 10.4 12 60 0.1 0.5 44.4
Mundane Readneutralized from SBS News (World) 8.6 9 60 0.1 0.4 44.4

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works