Subscribe Sign in

Courts / Queensland

Inquest examines why Joanne Butterfield disappeared without a trace

ABC News
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Missing PersonCourts

Show what we removed Rules applied: A2 C2 D2×2 D3×23 D4 F2 all 30 rules
  • When Joanne Butterfield suddenly disappeared without a trace in June 1998, some locals in her Far North Queensland town were quick to form suspicions.
  • To some, Ms Butterfield appeared troubled in the lead-up to her disappearance, friends and acquaintances her children would be better off if she left town.
  • Colleen Brischetto knew Joanne Butterfield in 1998, routinely driving her in the taxi, often to a local pub.
  • David Arduino, now 55, told the inquest he often collected Ms Butterfield and Mr Tati from the Mossman Hotel together in his cab.
  • Ms Brischetto said that about a week after Ms Butterfield disappeared, Mossman locals were discussing her possible whereabouts.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Mr Tati has told the inquest he only recalled meeting Ms Butterfield once. His friend, Anthony van den Broek gave evidence about an afternoon they picked up a hitchhiking Ms Butterfield on their way back to Cairns from Mossman.

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

When Joanne Butterfield suddenly disappeared without a trace in June 1998, some locals in her Far North Queensland town were quick to form suspicions.

As Colleen Brischetto, a long-time Mossman taxi operator, put it at a coronial inquest this week: "In a small town, everyone talks."

To some, Ms Butterfield appeared troubled in the lead-up to her disappearance, friends and acquaintances her children would be better off if she left town.

Coroner Stephanie Williams is examining whether Ms Butterfield has died and the adequacy of the police investigation into her disappearance.

Colleen Brischetto knew Joanne Butterfield in 1998, routinely driving her in the taxi, often to a local pub.

Mr Tati has told the inquest he only recalled meeting Ms Butterfield once.

However, Ms Brischetto's evidence said that in the two months before she disappeared, Ms Butterfield and Mr Tati argued "three or four times" at a taxi rank.

One of those occasions came after Mr Tati went looking for Ms Butterfield, asking Ms Brischetto to drive him to Mossman Gorge.

David Arduino, now 55, told the inquest he often collected Ms Butterfield and Mr Tati from the Mossman Hotel together in his cab.

Mr Arduino told the inquest that Ms Butterfield and Mr Tati argued in his taxi "several times".

The taxi driver said Mr Tati had a duffel bag with him and, at one point, asked Mr Arduino to pull over before briefly wandering into the scrub, the inquest heard.

Ms Brischetto said that about a week after Ms Butterfield disappeared, Mossman locals were discussing her possible whereabouts.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 5.1 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 5.8 6 77 25.2
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 5.1 6 77 25.2

Sign in to react.

This story is about a matter before the courts. Comments are closed on those, because what is written under them can prejudice a trial or damage somebody who has been charged with nothing. If something here is wrong, tell us — that we do read.