Subscribe Sign in

Culture / United States

It’s going to take more than an email to a public inbox to protect Australians from potential AI doom | Tom McIlroy

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceAnthony AlbaneseOpenAIDonald TrumpTechnology

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: It’s going to take more than an email to a public inbox to protect Australians from potential AI doom | Tom McIlroy

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×3 A2 A3×4 C1 C2 C5 D1 D2×7 D3×11 D4×3 E3×3 F2×6 all 30 rules
  • OpenAI’s hack of Medicare suggests safeguarding civilisation is the task facing leaders in this new era.
  • OpenAI boss Sam Altman and Dario Amodei of Anthropic gave briefings on the safety of artificial intelligence on Wednesday, as a nervous world watched on.
  • The words rang hollow less than 24 hours later, when Altman was the subject of a phone call from Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, after revelations a rogue OpenAI agent had hacked into sensitive Medicare systems in Australia.
  • Because the public inbox is checked routinely only once a day, the email was first read by staff within Services Australia on 11 September.
  • Behind closed doors Xi proposed continuing a dialogue with Trump to prevent AI “misuse and abuse”, while ahead of an expected drubbing in the November midterm elections, Trump said AI “concerns the future of humanity”.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims did not turn up in the report.

  • “Tom McIlroy” is named in the headline. We could not find it in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. Names are matched as they are spelled, so a report that says “New South Wales” where the headline says “NSW” is queried here when it should not be. One name in this headline is spelled almost the same as a word in the report — the difference between a country and its adjective, for instance. We cannot tell whether they are the same thing, so that one was not checked either way rather than reported as missing. How this is checked

OpenAI’s hack of Medicare suggests safeguarding civilisation is the task facing leaders in this new era.

More than 130 world leaders arrived on the United Nations headquarters in New York this week, joining the pageantry and speechmaking of the annual general assembly.

OpenAI boss Sam Altman and Dario Amodei of Anthropic gave briefings on the safety of artificial intelligence on Wednesday, as a nervous world watched on.

Speaking in the room where some of the biggest questions to face humanity have been deliberated on since the end of the second world war, Altman said the world faced a choice.

The words rang hollow less than 24 hours later, when Altman was the subject of a phone call from Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, after revelations a rogue OpenAI agent had hacked into sensitive Medicare systems in Australia.

The hack happened in June, but it took OpenAI executives until September to alert Services Australia that statistical data on Medicare use had been accessed.

Despite the company’s corporate might OpenAI deemed it appropriate to send an email to a public-facing Australian government address to raise the alarm, months after the hack.

Because the public inbox is checked routinely only once a day, the email was first read by staff within Services Australia on 11 September. Then on 22 September, public servants asked OpenAI for more information about the scale of the hack.

Behind closed doors Xi proposed continuing a dialogue with Trump to prevent AI “misuse and abuse”, while ahead of an expected drubbing in the November midterm elections, Trump said AI “concerns the future of humanity”.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 6.8 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story 14 27 29 0.1 41
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia 10.3 24 29 -0.1 41

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works