Subscribe Sign in

Politics

It’s OK to tell ICE their actions will haunt them, judge rules in speech fight

Ars Technica
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

PolicyCensorshipFirst AmendmentFree SpeechIce

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the report was edited: 767 words added, 1 removed.

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×3 A2 A3×7 A4 A6 C2×4 D2×8 D3×5 D4×2 E3 F2×2 all 30 rules
  • Back in January, David Streever sent a three-paragraph email to then-acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons.
  • At least for now, ICE has said that Streever’s email was protected speech, US District Judge Rudolph Contreras wrote in his opinion.
  • An official Department of Homeland Security (DHS) account made a “somewhat contradictory statement” in a X post that Streever reasonably understood as confirming that the probe was still underway, Contreras said.

3 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

At least for now, ICE has said that Streever’s email was protected speech, US District Judge Rudolph Contreras wrote in his opinion.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

It’s not illegal to send an email Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials that their actions will haunt them, a federal judge ruled Tuesday, granting a preliminary injunction that blocks ICE from threatening to prosecute a critic for protected speech.

Back in January, David Streever sent a three-paragraph email to then-acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons. Outraged by the killings of two Minnesota protestors against ICE, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, Streever told Lyons that he was a “monstrous human being” who will eat himself “alive with shame” for defending officers who shot people who posed no threat and had no weapons. Comparing Lyons to a high-ranking Nazi cop, Streever predicted that “even Trump” would one day turn on Lyons for defending the “obvious” slayings of Americans.

At least for now, ICE has said that Streever’s email was protected speech, US District Judge Rudolph Contreras wrote in his opinion.

ICE confirmed that the agency supposedly dropped the investigation within a month of sending the warning, but it never told Streever that his case was closed. An official Department of Homeland Security (DHS) account made a “somewhat contradictory statement” in a X post that Streever reasonably understood as confirming that the probe was still underway, Contreras said.

Instead, ICE noted that the email came amid a reported “946 percent increase in threats against ICE officials” between 2024 and 2025.

“I cherish our right to speak openly about issues of public concern,” Streever said in July as his free speech fight intensified and he felt forced to explain to his daughter that ICE might try to forcibly detain him.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 5 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is Ars Technica's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
Ars Technicaas they published this story 17 13 71 -0.4 19.4
Mundane Readneutralized from Ars Technica 13.1 10 71 -0.2 19.4

Sign in to react.

This story is about a death. Comments are closed on those, because the people closest to it are among the people who read them. If something here is wrong, tell us — that we do read.