Subscribe Sign in

Politics

Labor accused of throwing creatives ‘under the bus’ with proposal to ease copyright protections for AI giants

The Guardian Australia
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

PoliticsLabor PartyTechnologyOpenAIData centres

Show what we removed Rules applied: A2 A9 C2×2 D2×3 D3×9 E3×4 F2 all 30 rules
  • Compromise revealed as senior personnel from OpenAI, creator of ChatGPT, meets Albanese ministers.
  • The independent senator David Pocock said the compromise would throw protections for creatives and copyright holders “under the bus” in pursuit of datacentre funding.
  • AI companies have sought to train their models on content and data online but cannot do so using Australian content due to local copyright rules.
  • Labor’s industry minister, Tim Ayres, had on Monday said the government’s forthcoming AI rules would “in no way” involve a reduction in copyright protection.
  • Before the revelations on Tuesday afternoon, the Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the suggestions of a copyright compromise were “abhorrent”.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Compromise revealed as senior personnel from OpenAI, creator of ChatGPT, meets Albanese ministers.

The Albanese government is considering giving AI companies access to Australian creatives’ works by default as it pursues a compromise with US tech giants.

The independent senator David Pocock said the compromise would throw protections for creatives and copyright holders “under the bus” in pursuit of datacentre funding.

The proposals were contained in a document Pocock described as screenshots of government’s consultation proposals, tabled in the Senate on Tuesday and titled “AI on Australian Terms”.

AI companies have sought to train their models on content and data online but cannot do so using Australian content due to local copyright rules.

Under another, AI companies would do deals with creatives’ rights holder organisations that give the access rights even if the content were made by someone who was not a member of the organisation that won the deal.

Labor’s industry minister, Tim Ayres, had on Monday said the government’s forthcoming AI rules would “in no way” involve a reduction in copyright protection.

The deputy prime minister Richard Marles, said the federal government was “working at a pace” to respond to the issue of copyright, and said that the opportunity to work with US tech giants was a “significant moment for the country”.

Before the revelations on Tuesday afternoon, the Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the suggestions of a copyright compromise were “abhorrent”.

A spokesperson for Rowland on Tuesday said the government would ensure any future copyright changes delivered “meaningful control and fair compensation”.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 4.3 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story 7.7 7 79 0.1 52.1
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia 6.3 7 79 0.1 52.1

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works