Subscribe Sign in

Politics

Labor's migration target comes with a political catch

ABC News
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

ImmigrationAlpGovernment and PoliticsParliamentPolitics

Show what we removed Rules applied: A3×7 A6 C2 D2×11 D3×16 D4 F2×2 all 30 rules
  • Labor has made a lasting concession to a migration debate that shows little sign of rewarding them for joining it.
  • Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has now gone further by formally accepting the figure as a target and effectively turning it into a guarantee.
  • Fronting the National Press Club on Thursday, Burke declared the NOM forecast "must be met" and was unequivocal when pressed on the possibility of failure.
  • Research conducted by his firm Redbridge over the past year has found migration is a salient issue for only about 10 per cent of voters, with most already supporting One Nation.
  • One Nation want to plunge into the negative before settling at 130,000 in three years' time, while the Coalition will tie its target to housing completion rates and likely settle on an NOM of between 150,000 and 170,000.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

There is no guarantee Labor will get any political dividend from hitting 225,000.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Labor has made a lasting concession to a migration debate that shows little sign of rewarding them for joining it.

A Treasury forecast for net overseas migration to fall to 225,000 had already become a political benchmark to judge the federal government against.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has now gone further by formally accepting the figure as a target and effectively turning it into a guarantee.

Most Labor MPs will be glad to see the end of constant speculation about Labor's temporary migration policy, preceded by the six-week delay in unveiling the plan.

Burke delighted in dispelling some of the inaccurate reporting when he announced the tighter visa rules aimed at bringing down arrivals and increasing departures.

Fronting the National Press Club on Thursday, Burke declared the NOM forecast "must be met" and was unequivocal when pressed on the possibility of failure.

The distinction was academic, but future governments may wish Labor had never formally accepted NOM as a "target".

Research conducted by his firm Redbridge over the past year has found migration is a salient issue for only about 10 per cent of voters, with most already supporting One Nation.

Even on housing, only about 30 per cent of Australians believe migration has contributed in some way.

One Nation want to plunge into the negative before settling at 130,000 in three years' time, while the Coalition will tie its target to housing completion rates and likely settle on an NOM of between 150,000 and 170,000.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 8.7 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 12 19 40 -0.2 54.4
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 10.2 19 40 -0.2 54.4

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works