Subscribe Sign in

Sport / United Kingdom

Meet the new 55 minute England collapse, not the same as the old 55 minute England collapse | Barney Ronay

The Guardian Australia (Sport)
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

EnglandHarry KaneThomas TuchelSpainFootball

Show what we removed
  • Things started to go wrong against Spain at the same time they did against Argentina, but for different reasons and with far more cause for optimism.
  • Welcome to the witching hour, 55 minutes in, when things just seem to happen to Thomas Tuchel’s England.
  • On both occasions the final 35 minutes have been lost 2-0.
  • England were 2-1 up from 1-0 down at that point.
  • Fourteen minutes later Spain were 3-2 up, a lead they would hold on to.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Welcome to the witching hour, 55 minutes in. You can’t say England aren’t consistent.

Headline check

One of the five things this headline claims did not turn up in the report.

  • “Barney Ronay” is named in the headline. We could not find it in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. Names are matched as they are spelled, so a report that says “New South Wales” where the headline says “NSW” is queried here when it should not be. How this is checked

Things started to go wrong against Spain at the same time they did against Argentina, but for different reasons and with far more cause for optimism.

You could feel it inside the stadium, one of those moments where the air starts to shift, the birds fly backwards through the sky, and outside on Wembley Way an old man clutches his copy of the England Pathway Blueprint to his chest and cowers up at the moon. Welcome to the witching hour, 55 minutes in, when things just seem to happen to Thomas Tuchel’s England.

Before this Nations League opener there was general agreement on the desirability of systems, pattern, repeatability. Their last two matches, here and in Atlanta in July, have both involved going a goal ahead against the World Cup finalists, playing well and dominating parts of the game, right up until the 55-minute mark.

On both occasions the final 35 minutes have been lost 2-0.

At which point the team fell apart like an over-dunked digestive biscuit, reduced suddenly to a collection of hollow men, stuffed shirts, 12% possession merchants, the manager spooked into fielding a back five.

England were 2-1 up from 1-0 down at that point.

On 54 minutes a lengthy VAR check ended with a penalty awarded for a trip on Jude Bellingham that was combined also with a dive, but trip plus dive does not cancel trip.

54 ticked over into 55 minutes.

Fourteen minutes later Spain were 3-2 up, a lead they would hold on to.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 12.6 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Sport)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Sport)as they published this story 23.8 36 1 33.7
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Sport) 13.4 30 1 52

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works