Subscribe Sign in

Courts

Men tell inquest they had no involvement in missing mum's disappearance

ABC News
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Missing PersonCourts

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 D2×2 D3×28 D4×2 E3×6 E5 F2 all 30 rules
  • Two men from the Mossman area have been questioned at a coronial inquest into the 1998 disappearance of Joanne Butterfield.
  • The inquest is due to hear from several more witnesses in the coming days, including an associate of Ms Butterfield's, two taxi drivers and police forensic scientists.
  • Concetto Anthony Tati, 67, and Michael Francis O'Donoghue, 66, were called to give evidence at a coronial inquest into her disappearance in Cairns on Wednesday.
  • Mr Tati told the inquest he met Ms Butterfield "a long time ago" at the Mossman Hotel and went to her home, where they slept together.
  • The coroner said she took the views of Ms Butterfield's adult children, Skye Lemon and Thorne Nyker, into account in determining not to excuse the men from giving evidence.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Concetto Tati and Michael O'Donoghue denied any knowledge of how the 37-year-old mother disappeared. Concetto Anthony Tati and Michael Francis O'Donoghue were called to give evidence at a coronial inquest into her disappearance in Cairns on Wednesday.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Two men from the Mossman area have been questioned at a coronial inquest into the 1998 disappearance of Joanne Butterfield.

Concetto Tati, 67, and Michael O'Donoghue, 66, denied any knowledge of how the 37-year-old mother disappeared.

The inquest is due to hear from several more witnesses in the coming days, including an associate of Ms Butterfield's, two taxi drivers and police forensic scientists.

Ms Butterfield, then 37, was last seen hitchhiking along the Captain Cook Highway, south of Port Douglas, late on June 26, 1998.

Concetto Anthony Tati, 67, and Michael Francis O'Donoghue, 66, were called to give evidence at a coronial inquest into her disappearance in Cairns on Wednesday.

The inquest heard detectives had twice spoken to Mr Tati about Ms Butterfield's disappearance.

Neither he nor Mr O'Donoghue have been accused of any wrongdoing.

Mr Tati told the inquest he met Ms Butterfield "a long time ago" at the Mossman Hotel and went to her home, where they slept together.

Mr Tati estimated Ms Butterfield's disappearance "might've been a couple of months after that".

Mr O'Donoghue said Mr Tati was "not a mate but I knew him well" and the inquest heard the pair had before gone pig hunting together.

The coroner said she took the views of Ms Butterfield's adult children, Skye Lemon and Thorne Nyker, into account in determining not to excuse the men from giving evidence.

Earlier on Wednesday, the inquest heard from retired detective Trevor Perham, who became "invested" in the investigation after taking charge of it in 2002.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 4.9 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 10.8 10 75 -0.3 17.4
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 9.8 9 75 -0.2 17.4

Sign in to react.

This story is about a matter before the courts. Comments are closed on those, because what is written under them can prejudice a trial or damage somebody who has been charged with nothing. If something here is wrong, tell us — that we do read.