Subscribe Sign in

Meta will stop training its AI on 'visual data' from its smart glasses — if you opt out

Engadget
2 min read Rewritten in plain language

Meta

Show what we removed Rules applied: A3×3 C1 D2 D4×3 E3×4 F2 all 30 rules
  • Somewhere, a contractor just breathed a sigh of relief.
  • Now, the company says it will allow people to opt out of having their "visual data" from the glasses used for AI training.
  • Meta has long said that the actual content of photos you capture with the glasses' cameras are not shared or used for training.
  • Meta has also done a poor job of explaining this to people.
  • Your audio interactions with Meta AI are still fair game to the company for training and review, although the company does allow people to manually delete those recordings.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Meta has long said the actual content of photos you capture with the glasses' cameras are not shared or used for training. The opt-out does, at least, help Meta address some of its privacy critics.

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report2 min

Somewhere, a contractor just breathed a sigh of relief.

Meta is making another concession to privacy critics as it tries to get ahead of the ongoing privacy opposition against its AI glasses. Now, the company says it will allow people to opt out of having their "visual data" from the glasses used for AI training.

The change means that users can opt of having their camera-based interactions with Meta AI being used to train the company's models. Those images will also not be shown to third-party contractors in other countries.

"If you've opted out and you ask your glasses to translate a menu, we'll use your visual data to answer your question and then it's gone," Meta explained. "It isn't used for training and nobody reviews it for product improvement."

Meta has long said that the actual content of photos you capture with the glasses' cameras are not shared or used for training. But the company has allowed images and video captured while using Meta AI to be used for this purpose. This is confusing because these images and videos aren't saved to your camera roll, so a lot of people likely don't know that these captures are being saved, much less used for anything else. Meta has also done a poor job of explaining this to people. But the fact is that any interaction with Meta AI that relies on the camera — for example "Hey Meta, what does this sign mean" — is storing those images.

Even worse, those recordings are sometimes sent to third-party contractors in other countries who "review" and label the images for AI training. At least some of those contractors have reported seeing some personal and intimate images of people while doing this work, according to a report earlier this year.

The new setting addresses this. Though, it only covers visual data. Your audio interactions with Meta AI are still fair game to the company for training and review, although the company does allow people to manually delete those recordings. But the opt-out does, at least, help Meta address some of its privacy critics (and at least one proposed class-action lawsuit). The company also just revealed a new lineup of Ray-Ban-branded glasses that don't have cameras at all.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is Engadget's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
Engadgetas they published this story 12.6 8 63 -0.2 56.9
Mundane Readneutralized from Engadget 9.5 8 63 -0.0 56.9

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works