Subscribe Sign in

Microsoft tells nonprofits their deleted M365 data isn't coming back

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Saas

Show what we removed
  • Microsoft accidentally wiped some nonprofit customers' M365 data before their retention period expired – and now says it cannot tell them what disappeared, or even whether they lost anything.
  • Microsoft announced in May 2025 that the grant would not renew after July 1 that year.
  • In an email to one affected customer seen by The Register, Microsoft said that, "due to an error," it had deleted remaining data before the retention and export window closed.

3 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Grant retirement went off the rails, so Redmond is offering affected organizations help starting over.

Microsoft accidentally wiped some nonprofit customers' M365 data before their retention period expired – and now says it cannot tell them what disappeared, or even whether they lost anything.

The cockup followed Microsoft's retirement of its Microsoft 365 Business Premium grant, which gave eligible nonprofits ten free licenses for the productivity suite.

Microsoft announced in May 2025 that the grant would not renew after July 1 that year.

The company urged customers to move users onto another nonprofit plan before cancellation to avoid disruption or data loss. Organizations could also export anything they did not intend to retain in Microsoft 365.

In an email to one affected customer seen by The Register, Microsoft said that, "due to an error," it had deleted remaining data before the retention and export window closed.

Microsoft confirmed the premature deletion to The Register.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 5.1 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Register's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Registeras they published this story 7.9 4 73 -0.1 52.6
Mundane Readneutralized from The Register 6.3 4 73 -0.1 52.6

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works