Subscribe Sign in

Courts / France

Novelist accused of using AI to write book removed from French prize list

The Guardian Australia (Technology)
3 min read Rewritten in plain language

Prix GoncourtAwards and PrizesBooksPlagiarismFiction

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A2 A3 A6×2 D2 D3×10 D4 F2×4 all 30 rules
  • The organisers of France’s literary prize said they had removed a critically novel by a Canadian-Haitian writer from the longlist after an anonymous online account claimed the book was “almost entirely” written by AI.
  • The Haiti-born author’s book is a lyrical first-person account of how a history and geography teacher flees a home country mired in gang violence and embarks on a perilous journey across 12 countries before finding a haven in Canada.
  • Allegations that the book was written using AI emerged on X on 21 September, the same day It Was That or Die won the Fnac prize for best novel.
  • Questions have been raised over Pangram’s accuracy, and French media outlets have found other AI detection programmes that identified It Was That or Die as probably written by a human.
  • The Académie Goncourt will publish its shortlist on 6 October and announce the winner of the prize on 4 November.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Allegations that the book was written using AI emerged on X on 21 September, the same day It Was That or Die won the Fnac prize for best novel.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report3 min

Thélyson Orélien had been in the running to win a top literary prize before the AI claim emerged on social media

The organisers of France’s literary prize said they had removed a critically novel by a Canadian-Haitian writer from the longlist after an anonymous online account claimed the book was “almost entirely” written by AI.

The Académie Goncourt, a Paris-based literary organisation, said on Friday its decision to withdraw Thélyson Orélien’s novel C’était çan ou mourir (It Was That or Die) was “driven by the desire to preserve the integrity of the Goncourt prize and the academy itself, whose central role is to promote and honour literature written by women and men”.

The Haiti-born author’s book is a lyrical first-person account of how a history and geography teacher flees a home country mired in gang violence and embarks on a perilous journey across 12 countries before finding a haven in Canada.

Published in France by Grasset in August, it has sold about 35,000 copies and won the Prix du roman Fnac, with translation rights sold to more than 20 countries.

Allegations that the book was written using AI emerged on X on 21 September, the same day It Was That or Die won the Fnac prize for best novel.

An anonymous account called Balance ton Claude – a reference to Anthropic’s AI agent – said it had fed the novel into the AI detection software Pangram and found it to be “almost entirely” written by artificial intelligence.

Questions have been raised over Pangram’s accuracy, and French media outlets have found other AI detection programmes that identified It Was That or Die as probably written by a human.

Orélien, 38, has denied the allegation, saying it was racially motivated. “I’ve always loved creating and writing,” he said. “I don’t see why I would use a machine.”

He told the newspaper Libération that he used traditional language and rhythms that were Haitian and Caribbean. “The imagery, repetition and rhythm are a living language, they are mine.”

The author of the anonymous X account was later identified on the pages of the centre-right newspaper Le Figaro as one of its own columnists, Samuel Fitoussi, the author of an essay against “wokeism” on film and TV.

On his own X account, Fitoussi said he had initiated his campaign because even though he was “techno-optimistic”, he feared that “AI will cause the disappearance of reading and writing”.

On Wednesday Philippe Claudel, the Académie Goncourt’s president, had urged caution over the allegations. But separate accusations of plagiarism against Orélien published in French media appeared to have caused a change of heart.

Libération alleged in an article that the author plagiarised a short story from the preface of the French journalist Louis Pauwels’ book The Morning of the Magicians, originally published in 1960.

In its statement the academy referred to the “plagiarisms of which its author has been guilty over time and which have just been revealed, as well as the convergent result of several analyses by trustworthy researchers and journalists highlighting the fact that [the book] is in all likelihood very largely the product of artificial intelligence”.

“The aim is to send a clear message,” it added, “to affirm that we neither endorse nor condone in any way the creation of texts generated with the help of AI.”

In a statement shared with the Guardian, the novel’s original publisher, Le Éditions du Boréal, said: “Unfortunately, at this stage, we are unable to confirm or deny the allegations the author is facing.”

The Canada-based publisher said it was important not tojump to conclusions, adding: “Without credible, concrete evidence, it is not our place to decide whether this book has a right to exist.”

Boréal said it was “concerned” about the newer plagiarism allegations, but added it was important to remember there was a real person behind the book. “We unequivocally condemn the hateful messages and personal attacks of recent days, and we urge everyone to show restraint,” it said.

Orélien has said he will not comment further on the latest allegations. Speaking on Thursday at Les Correspondances literary festival in Manosque, southern France, he said: “There’s this desire not only to attack the book, but especially my voice … to silence me,” adding that he would therefore “take a step back and wait until things have calmed down”.

The Académie Goncourt will publish its shortlist on 6 October and announce the winner of the prize on 4 November.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Technology)'s report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Technology)as they published this story 8 14 80 62
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Technology) 6.3 12 80 62

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works