Subscribe Sign in

Science / Sydney, NSW

One of Sydney’s largest councils joins ban on ‘pervert’ glasses at local swimming pools

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

TechnologySurveillancePrivacy

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A2×2 A3 C1 C2 D2×2 D3×10 E3 all 30 rules
  • One of Sydney’s largest councils has joined the City of Brisbane and the City of Yarra to issue a ban on AI smart glasses at public pools as concerns mount over the potential for predators to exploit the new technology.
  • Last month, Brisbane became the first council in Australia to publicly announce a ban on covert filming at its 21 public pools amid fears of threats to child safety.
  • Randwick council in Sydney’s eastern suburbs has also banned the new technology at the Des Renford leisure centre.
  • The federal attorney general, Michelle Rowland, has not ruled out banning the glasses but has showed how the laws are governing the new technology.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Councillors say locals have been raising concerns about people secretly filming in change rooms, swimming pools and around schools.

One of Sydney’s largest councils has joined the City of Brisbane and the City of Yarra to issue a ban on AI smart glasses at public pools as concerns mount over the potential for predators to exploit the new technology.

On Tuesday evening, Canterbury-Bankstown voted in favour of banning the tech at its pools, with its mayor, Bilal El-Hayek, describing them as “pervert glasses”.

Since their release, there have been reports of women being filmed without their consent and their interactions with a glasses-wearing influencer posted on social media.

Last month, Brisbane became the first council in Australia to publicly announce a ban on covert filming at its 21 public pools amid fears of threats to child safety.

The head of policy at Digital Rights Watch, Tom Sulston, praised the decision.

Yarra in inner-Melbourne followed suit, voting last week to ban smart glasses from its leisure and aquatic facilities, childcare centres and playgrounds.

Randwick council in Sydney’s eastern suburbs has also banned the new technology at the Des Renford leisure centre. In a statement, it said “growing community concerns” about their potential misuse were behind the decision.

The federal attorney general, Michelle Rowland, has not ruled out banning the glasses but has showed how the laws are governing the new technology.

In August, she wrote to the privacy commissioner, Carly Kind, raising concerns she’d received from the community about their uptake and requesting it be given priority consideration.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 7.3 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Technology)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Technology)as they published this story 10.2 12 73 -0.2 51.4
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Technology) 7.5 11 73 -0.1 51.4

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works