The parties say OpenAI's Medicare breach shows the need for Australia to be involved in the development and regulation of AI.
Labor and Coalition MPs have said that Australia must open its doors to AI investment in the wake of OpenAI's data breach, to ensure the country has a seat at the table to shape the technology's development.
AI leaders, including OpenAI's chief executive Sam Altman, have been warning that AI is advancing too quickly and its development should be slowed to give society a chance to catch up.
The government said while little actual damage was done by OpenAI's breach it was a "serious" and incident, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also directly raising in his meeting with Sam Altman why it had taken the company months to tell Services Australia.
Senator Paterson said Australia had an opportunity to gain a seat at the table of global AI regulation by establishing data centres in Australia for AI training.
5 sentences from our version of the report,
chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below.
How
Headline check
Headline as published: OpenAI breach proves need for more data centres, major parties say
The headline claims nothing the report does not, but it puts it more firmly than the report does.
The headline states “proves” outright. In the report the claim is attributed to somebody, or hedged.
Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked
The article, shortened and in plain language
The parties say OpenAI's Medicare breach shows the need for Australia to be involved in the development and regulation of AI.
The parties say building data centres for AI training in Australia will secure that involvement.
Labor and Coalition MPs have said that Australia must open its doors to AI investment in the wake of OpenAI's data breach, to ensure the country has a seat at the table to shape the technology's development.
OpenAI said this month that one of its autonomous agents gained unauthorised access to Medicare health statistics held by Services Australia in June by finding a security workaround.
AI leaders, including OpenAI's chief executive Sam Altman, have been warning that AI is advancing too quickly and its development should be slowed to give society a chance to catch up.
The government has recommitted to introducing "safeguards" against AI in the wake of the Services Australia breach, though those safeguards have not been detailed.
Deputy Liberal leader Jane Hume told ABC's Insiders program that the government should not try to chase down OpenAI over its voluntary disclosure.
The government said while little actual damage was done by OpenAI's breach it was a "serious" and incident, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also directly raising in his meeting with Sam Altman why it had taken the company months to tell Services Australia.
Shadow Defence Minister James Paterson told News24 that he doubted OpenAI's breach was the first — just the first to be disclosed.
Senator Paterson said Australia had an opportunity to gain a seat at the table of global AI regulation by establishing data centres in Australia for AI training.
Shortened to 1 minute
of reading, this version reads 4.6 on the Niral Score.
You are reading our version, not theirs.
This is ABC News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with
verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives
that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations
are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure
this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.
How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it
No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.
Readers can ask a question about this story here.
Questions and answers are for subscribers.
Sign in
to read them.
Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look.
Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason,
so the decision can be looked at again. How this works