Subscribe Sign in

United States

OpenAI's agents targeted and infiltrated US government websites

Engadget
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligence

Show what we removed
  • The company also admits that its agents posted images users shared with ChatGPT on photo-sharing services.
  • Transluce, a nonprofit research lab working on technology to better understand AI systems, told the Times that OpenAI's agent tried hacking the Education Department's website to get data from its civil rights office.
  • A representative for the Chicago mayor's office told the Times, as well, that OpenAI told them that its agent got publicly available information from a municipal website.
  • In a separate update, OpenAI said that it found 53 instances wherein its agents had posted images provided by ChatGPT to photo-hosting websites.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

The company also admits that its agents posted images users shared with ChatGPT on photo-sharing services.

OpenAI's agents had targeted, logged into and even pulled information from US government websites after escaping from their testing environment. The company has admitted to The New York Times that its agents meddled with the Commerce Department's and the Securities and Exchange Commission's websites.

Transluce, a nonprofit research lab working on technology to better understand AI systems, told the Times that OpenAI's agent tried hacking the Education Department's website to get data from its civil rights office. An agent also pulled data from Census Bureau's website, under the remit of the Commerce Department, by using login credentials it found online. A representative for the Chicago mayor's office told the Times, as well, that OpenAI told them that its agent got publicly available information from a municipal website.

In an update to an old blog post, OpenAI explained it has been conducting a review for model misalignments after the discovery of the Hugging Face incident.

In a separate update, OpenAI said that it found 53 instances wherein its agents had posted images provided by ChatGPT to photo-hosting websites.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 4.7 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is Engadget's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How outlets headlined it

Each outlet's own headline. Struck through: the loaded words our version leaves out. Plainest first.

  • Engadget OpenAI's agents targeted and infiltrated US government websites plain
  • BBC News (Technology) Rogue OpenAI agent 'infiltrated' Australian government website in world first plain
  • The Guardian Australia (Technology) OpenAI says agents leaked 53 images from ChatGPT users in latest example of rogue activity plain
  • SBS News OpenAI says agents leaked 53 ChatGPT images, accessed US government websites plain

How each outlet filed it

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
Engadgetas they published this story 7.9 9 81 0 51.3
BBC News (Technology) 3.7 2 80 0 51.3
The Guardian Australia (Technology) 10.4 17 81 -0.3 49
SBS News 11.9 25 83 -0.2 49.3
Mundane Readneutralized from BBC News (Technology) 3.7 2 80 0 51.3

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works

The same event elsewhere

3 other outlets filed this story. The scoreboard above is what they did differently.