‘Campus Collection’ aimed to mark 1893 club founding
Range pulled from website two hours after launch
Oxford United have abandoned a new range of American style-sportswear after it inadvertently referenced the incident of September 11.
The League One club launched their new “Campus Collection” on Friday morning but had removed it from sale by lunchtime, after clothing designs were revealed to bear the slogan “United 93”. The U’s immediately published an apology that admitted to a lack of understanding of “the historical context and associations” related to the branding and made “sincere apologies for this error and any offence caused.”
“Inspired by the style and culture of American sports”, the club originally trailed the Campus Collection as launching on 11 September of this year, the 25th anniversary of the atrocity that killed nearly 3,000 people. Concerns over sensitivity saw the launch then delayed, but when the online collection was made available for sale on Friday, images showed models wearing an NFL-style shirt with “United 93” on the chest, in recognition of Oxford being founded in 1893.
United 93 was one of four domestic passenger jets seized by al-Qaida terrorists on 11 September 2001. A mutiny by passengers prevented hijackers from using the plane to destroy a government building in Washington DC, and it crashed into a field, killing all 44 people on board. A film titled “United 93” was also made about the incident.
The Campus Collection was live for approximately two hours on Friday before the webpage was deleted by the club after they realised the meaning of the phrase. “The range was released without understanding of the historical context and associations”, the club statement read. “It should not have reached the point of sale and we take full responsibility for not undertaking proper due diligence.
“We have removed the collection with immediate effect and are reviewing our approval processes to ensure nothing like this happens again. Once again, we would like to put on record our sincere apologies for this error and any offence caused.”
Opinion was mixed among Oxford fans, with many outraged but others inclined to forgive the error. One user of the Yellows Forum called it a “monumental cock-up that I would expect to be sacked for if I’d signed off on it”. Another wrote: “Whilst not ideal … everyone who sees this realises there’s no malicious intent. Ultimately there was just no consideration to it at all.”