Subscribe Sign in

Politics

Politician apologises for yelling, swearing in staff meeting

ABC News
2 min read Rewritten in plain language

State and Territory ParliamentIndependents

Show what we removed Rules applied: A3 C2 D2 D3×7 D4 all 30 rules
  • Independent MLA Fiona Carrick has apologised for an outburst that was found to have breached the code of conduct for members of the Legislative Assembly.
  • Ms Carrick apologised on the recommendation of the committee, which said she had but unsuccessfully tried to address tensions in her office.
  • A staff member made a formal complaint, alleging Ms Carrick had breached the MLA code of conduct during a meeting in May.
  • Commissioner Ken Crispin referred the matter to the assembly's standing committee on administration and procedure, which recommended Ms Carrick apologise to the assembly, which she did.
  • The committee said the evidence provided to the commissioner "clearly demonstrated" tension existed in Ms Carrick's office before the May incident, and arose from "interpersonal difficulties between two staff members".

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Commissioner Ken Crispin referred the matter to the assembly's standing committee on administration and procedure which she did.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report2 min

Independent MLA Fiona Carrick has apologised for an outburst that was found to have breached the code of conduct for members of the Legislative Assembly.

A committee that investigated the incident found that it indicated Ms Carrick's previous behaviour, including allegations of inadequate responses to bullying complaints in the office.

Ms Carrick apologised on the recommendation of the committee, which said she had but unsuccessfully tried to address tensions in her office.

Independent Fiona Carrick has apologised in the ACT Legislative Assembly after she "yelled, swore and slammed the table" during a staff meeting.

A staff member made a formal complaint, alleging Ms Carrick had breached the MLA code of conduct during a meeting in May.

The assembly's commissioner for standards found Ms Carrick had breached the code through "shouting at a staff member despite repeated requests for her to stop, swearing, slamming the table and threatening not to renew an employment contract in front of other staff".

Commissioner Ken Crispin referred the matter to the assembly's standing committee on administration and procedure, which recommended Ms Carrick apologise to the assembly, which she did.

"I acknowledge that my conduct on that occasion fell below the standard I expect of myself, and the standard rightly expected of members of this assembly," Ms Carrick told the assembly this afternoon.

"I apologised to those involved at the time, and today I apologise to the assembly."

She said her current team of staff was working "collaboratively and effectively" together.

"This experience has reinforced to me the importance of maintaining a workplace that is respectful, collegiate and safe," she said.

"I remain committed to upholding those standards and to supporting the wellbeing of all my staff members."

The complaint centred around obligations upon MLAs in the code "to promote a workplace that is collegiate, inclusive and diverse and in which health and safety risks are eliminated or minimised; and by their conduct reflect such a workplace".

The commissioner found Ms Carrick failed in her requirement to, in her own conduct, reflect a collegiate, inclusive, diverse and safe workplace.

The committee's report detailed how four staff were present at the weekly team meeting.

According to the committee, the commissioner said it was "an isolated outburst of frustration" and that Ms Carrick had said that she had not handled the situation professionally.

The report said information provided by staff "threw a wider net over Ms Carrick's behaviour and allegations that she had failed to adequately address formal and informal complaints about bullying in the office".

The committee said the evidence provided to the commissioner "clearly demonstrated" tension existed in Ms Carrick's office before the May incident, and arose from "interpersonal difficulties between two staff members".

"Ms Carrick was advised to arrange an independent investigation into the allegations; however, she instead implemented a workplace communication workshop for the team," the report said.

"That workshop, however, did not produce the desired outcome and raised other concerns."

Ms Carrick told the commissioner that she had then adopted a "structured intervention", which included engaging an independent workplace therapist.

The commissioner noted Ms Carrick had "made well-meaning attempts to address the tension and conflicts that had arisen."

Ms Carrick was elected as a member for Murrumbidgee at the 2024 election.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 7.7 5 81 51.8
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 6.5 5 81 51.8

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works