Subscribe Sign in

Project leader thought his team understood the plan, ended up fixing their 'interpretation' of it

2 min read Rewritten in plain language

Networks

Show what we removed Rules applied: A3 C2 D2 D3 E3×4 F2×2 all 30 rules
  • Welcome to another edition of On Call, The Register ’s reader-contributed Friday column that celebrates the unique workplace cultures that make delivering tech support such delightful fun.
  • Antonio gathered the local team for a town hall meeting at which he introduced himself to the 25-strong tech team who would work on the project.
  • A solemn-faced team member offered an explanation: “Our way is better.”
  • Antonio said he tried to explain his point of view and eventually came to realize that when working abroad, understanding local culture can be as important as technical skill.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is not in the report.

  • The headline puts “interpretation” in quotation marks. Nobody says those words anywhere in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report2 min

Malicious compliance crosses cultural barriers

Welcome to another edition of On Call, The Register ’s reader-contributed Friday column that celebrates the unique workplace cultures that make delivering tech support such delightful fun.

This week, meet a reader we’ll Regomize as “Antonio” who told us that in the late 1990s he worked for a multinational financial services organization.

Not long after taking the job, Antonio was dispatched to Hong Kong to oversee the regional rollout of a new reverse proxy.

Antonio gathered the local team for a town hall meeting at which he introduced himself to the 25-strong tech team who would work on the project.

“I walked them through exactly what we were going to do and how everything had to be configured,” he explained to On Call. And then, cognizant that some on the team were more comfortable speaking Cantonese, he apologized for speaking in English for so long and asked if everyone understood the plan.

“I was met with beaming faces and vigorously nodding heads,” Antonio told On Call.

“Implementation weekend came and went in a bit of a blur, but on Monday morning all sorts of weird things started to go wrong,” Antonio wrote.

He looked into it and found configurations that were close to those he had put in the plan, but not quite perfect.

“Key parts of our production environment - and elements on which we had dependencies, like load balancers, routers and so on, we're all ‘out of whack,” he told On Call.

It took Antonio four days to figure out the problems and fix the mess.

“I eventually pulled the team back together for a de-brief to figure out where things had gone wrong and why the production build had been subtly tweaked so that it appeared to comply with our plans but in fact did not.”

A solemn-faced team member offered an explanation: “Our way is better.”

Antonio responded without containing his incredulity. "Not better," he countered, "because the parts you changed broke.”

He then reminded the team that he had asked if they understood the migration plan, and that everyone indicated they did.

“So can you help me understand why you said you understood the plan and then did something else?" he asked.

"We said we understood your plan,” came the response. “That was the question you asked, not whether we would follow it. Our plan was different. Our plan was better."

Antonio said he tried to explain his point of view and eventually came to realize that when working abroad, understanding local culture can be as important as technical skill.

Or as he put it to On Call: “Tech is easy. People are hard.”

Have you attempted to make tech work across cultures? If so, click here to send your story to On Call so we can share it on a future Friday. ®

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Register's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Registeras they published this story 7 4 80 0.4 50
Mundane Readneutralized from The Register 6 4 80 0.4 50

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works