Subscribe Sign in

United Kingdom

Pubs in England and Wales to allow digital ID apps to prove age

2 min read Rewritten in plain language
Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the report was edited: 495 words added, 6 removed.

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A6 C2 D2×7 D3×10 D4 E3×3 F2×5 all 30 rules
  • Alcohol buyers will be able to use a digital ID app on their phones to prove their age under new rules introduced on Tuesday.
  • Customers will be able to choose ID apps from a range of suppliers such as the Post Office, Yoti or Luciditi, provided they are on a government-approved list.
  • Yoti's digital ID app, for example, will only let a user log in if a scan of their face matches that of the person who signed up for the app.
  • Allen Simpson, chief executive of trade body UKHospitality, said the new rules were a "positive step".
  • Jasleen Chaggar of Big Brother Watch said while having multiple ways to prove your identity was helpful, the Government should ensure that digital ID did not become effectively mandatory "as it would shut out millions of people".

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report2 min

Alcohol buyers will be able to use a digital ID app on their phones to prove their age under new rules introduced on Tuesday.

Pubs and shops in England and Wales can use the tech in addition to current physical forms of ID - with the government saying a digital option will make age-checks quicker and more secure for customers and staff.

Customers will be able to choose ID apps from a range of suppliers such as the Post Office, Yoti or Luciditi, provided they are on a government-approved list.

The change means businesses will no longer be required to let people use physical ID, but the government contends most establishments would.

The plan will be technology-agnostic, meaning that the government is not setting out in detail how each app must work.

It argues that under the voluntary digital ID scheme, drinkers would share fewer personal details with a venue or shop - such as tapping their phone on a reader or displaying a scannable QR code rather than handing over an official document.

The apps will also need to guard against customers borrowing devices from older friends and relatives, and ensure the ID app belongs to the person using it.

Yoti's digital ID app, for example, will only let a user log in if a scan of their face matches that of the person who signed up for the app.

The app then generates a QR code that can be scanned by a business with a free checker app, which tells them the person's age.

This is time-limited to make duping or sharing the QR code more difficult.

Digital government minister Stephanie Peacock said having the option for digital ID would "mean you do not need to carry a physical ID, nor hand over sensitive personal information" meaning people could "feel safer on a night out'".

Allen Simpson, chief executive of trade body UKHospitality, said the new rules were a "positive step".

He added the industry would work with government to make sure the scheme's roll-out would not be "burdensome" for the hospitality sector.

This would include ensuring there were multiple options for suppliers and that it was cost-efficient, Simpson said.

The government wants digital ID apps under its scheme to work together so customers do not need to use different apps in different venues.

It also wants the services to work offline and accessible even without mobile data or a Wi-Fi connection.

In future, the digital proof of age scheme could be extended to cover tobacco and vapes.

But digital rights campaigners have said such measures could lead to the exclusion of some groups.

Jasleen Chaggar of Big Brother Watch said while having multiple ways to prove your identity was helpful, the Government should ensure that digital ID did not become effectively mandatory "as it would shut out millions of people".

"Many people have legitimate reasons for relying on physical ID, whether out of choice, privacy and security concerns, or because they lack the digital skills or means to use digital ID," she said.

"The Government should expressly prohibit businesses from requiring digital IDs for age checks without offering reasonable alternatives," she added.

The new rules come after a wider digital ID programme promoted by former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer proved controversial, and was later abandoned by Andy Burnham.

Digital ID plan to be ended in Burnham's first policy pledge

How can you keep your child safe online?

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is BBC News (Technology)'s report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
BBC News (Technology)as they published this story 12.4 10 39 0.1 53.9
Mundane Readneutralized from BBC News (Technology) 11.3 9 39 0.1 53.9

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works