Subscribe Sign in

Courts

RansomHouse picks a fight with Namibia's defense establishment

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Cyber Crime

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A3 A4 C5 D3×9 E3×4 F2 all 30 rules
  • Namibia's computer security incident response team has confirmed unauthorized activity in the defense ministry's network and linked it to the RansomHouse cybercrime group.
  • RansomHouse identified the victim as the "Namibian Defence Force," although the domain in its listing belongs to the Ministry of Defence and Veterans Affairs (MODVA), the government department overseeing the military.
  • The listing treated the target as a company with $434 million in annual revenue, but NAM-CSIRT later confirmed unauthorized activity within MODVA's network.
  • Emilia Nghikembua, chief executive of the Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia and head of NAM-CSIRT, said the team would support MODVA throughout its investigation and recovery.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

National cyber team confirms the breach, but not whether data was stolen or encrypted.

Namibia's computer security incident response team has confirmed unauthorized activity in the defense ministry's network and linked it to the RansomHouse cybercrime group.

In a direct attribution, NAM-CSIRT named the group after RansomHouse listed the supposed victim on its leak site on September 16.

RansomHouse identified the victim as the "Namibian Defence Force," although the domain in its listing belongs to the Ministry of Defence and Veterans Affairs (MODVA), the government department overseeing the military.

Either way, openly extorting a country's defense establishment is a move even by ransomware standards.

RansomHouse's website stated: "Dear management of Namibian Defence Force."

The listing treated the target as a company with $434 million in annual revenue, but NAM-CSIRT later confirmed unauthorized activity within MODVA's network.

NAM-CSIRT said in a statement: "Analysis of the affected systems established that the incident is associated with the RansomHouse ransomware group, a cybercriminal syndicate known internationally for deploying ransomware and engaging in so-called double extortion tactics where threat actors encrypt systems while simultaneously threatening to disclose alleged stolen information."

Emilia Nghikembua, chief executive of the Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia and head of NAM-CSIRT, said the team would support MODVA throughout its investigation and recovery.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 4.8 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Register's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Registeras they published this story 8.4 12 79 -0.2 47.9
Mundane Readneutralized from The Register 7.1 11 79 -0.2 47.9

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works