Subscribe Sign in

Business

Revolut reportedly facing $3m ransom demand after hackers steal hundreds of customers’ data

The Guardian Australia (Business)
3 min read Rewritten in plain language

RevolutBusinessFinancial Sector

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A2×3 A3×2 A5 C5×6 D1×3 D2×4 D3×13 D4×2 E4 F2 all 30 rules
  • Revolut is facing a reported $3m (£2.2m) ransom demand after hackers posing as government officials accessed the data of hundreds of the bank’s cryptocurrency customers, including one victim who says he fears for his safety.
  • While the data breach only affected about 680 of Revolut’s 80 million global customers, it is believed to have targeted customers with suspected cryptocurrency holdings.
  • The former chief executive of failed bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, Mark Karpelès, said he was one of the victims of the data breach and is now worried about his family’s safety.
  • The French business owner, who has been a Revolut customer since 2023, said that hackers may have mistakenly targeted his account, thinking he was wealthier than he is.
  • The hacker then said they would delete the information, but only if they were sent $50,000, Karpelès said.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Revolut is facing a reported $3m ransom demand after hackers posing as government officials accessed the data of hundreds of the bank’s cryptocurrency customers.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report3 min

Europe’s largest financial technology company confirmed it had fallen victim to an impersonation scam last week

Revolut is facing a reported $3m (£2.2m) ransom demand after hackers posing as government officials accessed the data of hundreds of the bank’s cryptocurrency customers, including one victim who says he fears for his safety.

Europe’s largest financial technology company confirmed last weekend that it had fallen victim to an impersonation scam in which hackers compromised an Italian government email system to contact Revolut staff and request personal customer details.

While the data breach only affected about 680 of Revolut’s 80 million global customers, it is believed to have targeted customers with suspected cryptocurrency holdings.

It is not how the scandal might affect Revolut’s much-anticipated stock market debut, with Revolut’s founder, Nik Storonsky, Les Echoes on Thursday that there were plans for a dual listing in both London and New York.

One of the alleged hackers has reportedly threatened to publish the customer data unless Revolut pays a $3m ransom, according to the Financial Times, which has been speaking to the purported hacker. A Revolut spokesperson said the bank “has not received any direct contact or demand from the individuals or group making these claims”.

But some victims have said they fear they could end up being forced to face ransoms.

The former chief executive of failed bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, Mark Karpelès, said he was one of the victims of the data breach and is now worried about his family’s safety. “I have kids, we’re living together. My address is in those files, so of course I’m worried about this,” he told the Guardian.

He has since contacted law enforcement in Tokyo, where he lives, after saying in a X post earlier this week that he feared he could be “kidnapped or dead” by the time Revolut gave him information about the breach.

Karpelès said he was relieved that Japanese officials were taking the threat seriously, “but I might still have to travel overseas or be in places that may not be as safe”.

The French business owner, who has been a Revolut customer since 2023, said that hackers may have mistakenly targeted his account, thinking he was wealthier than he is. He said he was forced to declare bankruptcy in the wake of a high-profile court case in Japan.

Karpelès is a figure in the crypto world. He was charged, but later acquitted, of embezzlement by Japanese courts, following the collapse of the crypto exchange platform in 2014. He was found guilty of falsifying data.

Karpelès said he has joined a victim chat group on X in the wake of the data breach, where customers having been sharing information and support. “We’re all in the same situation, which is: we don’t know exactly what happened, or how it happened, so we’re trying to get as much information as possible,” he said. He added that one of the victims got in touch with the purported hacker, who showed they had the victim’s personal details on hand.

The hacker then said they would delete the information, but only if they were sent $50,000, Karpelès said.

While Karpelès was frustrated with Revolut, which was valued at $115bn in a secondary share sale earlier this summer, he does not believe the bank should pay the $3m ransom, which gives no guarantee that the data will be deleted.

It is still not how many hackers are involved, and requests for the ransom to be paid through a platform known as Monero, meaning there would be no evidence or receipt of payment, allowing the hacker to claim they never received the money in the first place.

Karpelès hopes Revolut will share more information about the breach.

“This is very, very damaging [for the Revolut brand] because I do believe a lot of Revolut customers are more likely to be privacy sensitive,” he said, noting that this was usually a high priority among people invested in cryptocurrencies.

A Revolut spokesperson said:“Revolut recently identified a sophisticated external impersonation scam where an unauthorised third party utilised a government agency domain email to submit fraudulent requests for information.

“Upon detection, we immediately blocked the address and alerted the relevant government agency as well as enforcement agencies, data protection, and financial regulators. Revolut systems and customer funds are unaffected. We have contacted the limited number of impacted individuals directly to inform them and provide support.”

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Business)'s report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentGenderHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Business)as they published this story 12.2 14 61 -0.5 2 37.5
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Business) 8.2 10 61 -0.5 0 37.5

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works