Subscribe Sign in

Courts / Queensland

Short-stay owner ordered to pay compensation after refusing guide dog user

ABC News
2 min read Rewritten in plain language

CourtsDiscrimination

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 D2 D3×4 E3 all 30 rules
  • A Queensland woman has won an anti-discrimination case after being booted out of short-stay accommodation because she had a guide dog.
  • The owner, Brendan Farrugia, must pay Ms Whittle $3,500 by September 29.
  • Brendan Farrugia appeared before the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal after being caught on tape refusing service to Moreton Bay woman Janice Whittle.
  • The video, which was shown during the hearing, shows Mr Farrugia refusing to allow Ms Whittle into the property because of her guide dog.
  • Practice director Sam Tracy said guide dog users faced this kind of discrimination on a daily basis, but it almost never reached a court.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

The video shows Mr Farrugia refusing to allow Ms Whittle into the property because of her guide dog.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report2 min

A Queensland woman has won an anti-discrimination case after being booted out of short-stay accommodation because she had a guide dog.

Janice Whittle filmed an exchange using AI smart glasses.

The owner, Brendan Farrugia, must pay Ms Whittle $3,500 by September 29.

A Queensland man has been ordered to pay compensation to a legally blind woman he kicked out of his short-stay house for having a guide dog.

Brendan Farrugia appeared before the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal after being caught on tape refusing service to Moreton Bay woman Janice Whittle.

The tribunal ordered Mr Farrugia to pay $3,500 to Ms Whittle for breaching Queensland's anti-discrimination laws.

Mr Farrugia told 612 ABC Brisbane he had "made a mistake" and would follow the tribunal's orders.

Ms Whittle used smart glasses to secretly record her confrontation with Mr Farrugia outside Sunny's Piece of Paradise in Agnes Water in December 2024.

The video, which was shown during the hearing, shows Mr Farrugia refusing to allow Ms Whittle into the property because of her guide dog.

In the video, he tells Ms Whittle that he would not have allowed her to book accommodation in the first place if he had known she had a guide dog.

During the exchange, Mr Farrugia tells Ms Whittle he had a "no pets" policy and she would need to pay a $100 cleaning fee if she wanted to stay.

In Queensland it is illegal to refuse service to a guide dog user and also illegal to charge additional cleaning fees because of a guide dog.

Mr Farrugia said he had made an honest mistake, and asked 612 ABC Brisbane to "please leave me alone".

"It happened, I made a mistake, let's move forward," he said.

"I'm a business owner, doing what I can, in these challenging economic times."

Mr Farrugia was given until September 28 to pay the money.

This tribunal case follows criminal proceedings in which a Magistrates Court fined Mr Farrugia $2,800 for breaching the Guide, Hearing, and Assistance Dog Act over the same incident.

Ms Whittle said she bought the smart glasses because she had been repeatedly refused service in restaurants, hotels, airports and other venues.

"I've been abused pretty much all my life and I've never stood up for myself," Ms Whittle said.

"I couldn't put up with it anymore and I want people to know it's against the law to refuse a guide dog."

Human rights lawyers from Basic Rights Queensland provided legal advice to Ms Whittle during her civil hearings.

Practice director Sam Tracy said guide dog users faced this kind of discrimination on a daily basis, but it almost never reached a court.

"This is a very significant case in regards to disability discrimination in Queensland," Mr Tracy said.

"We don't often see decisions where compensation is reached, they're often settled.

"This case represents not only a significant use of the protections under state law, but also under anti-discrimination law."

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 7.9 5 70 -0.1 55.4
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 6.9 4 70 -0.1 55.4

Sign in to react.

This story is about a matter before the courts. Comments are closed on those, because what is written under them can prejudice a trial or damage somebody who has been charged with nothing. If something here is wrong, tell us — that we do read.