Subscribe Sign in

Adelaide, SA

'Sophistication' dispute over foot traffic decline in Adelaide CBD

2 min read Rewritten in plain language

Shopping District and High StreetUrban Development and PlanningShopping CentresShopping

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 C1 C2×2 D3 E3 all 30 rules
  • Foot traffic in Adelaide's CBD has declined in recent years, according to data contained in city council documents.
  • A decline in foot traffic in Adelaide's CBD has prompted a prominent property industry lobbyist to take a swipe at the city council, which he has accused of lacking "sophistication".
  • A month-by-month dashboard, published by the Adelaide Economic Development Agency, shows 13.9 million visits were recorded citywide in the month of July 2023, before the figure fell to 10.9 million in July 2024.
  • Adelaide Lord Mayor Jane Lomax-Smith rejected Mr Djite's criticisms, but said she did not wish to "have a discussion about people's character".
  • Cr Lomax-Smith said CBD parking in Adelaide compared favourably with other Australian capital cities, and added that the council's housing strategy was paying dividends.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Cr Lomax-Smith said CBD parking in Adelaide compared favourably with other Australian capital cities, and added the council's housing strategy was paying dividends.

Headline check

Headline as published: 'Sophistication' spat over foot traffic decline in Adelaide CBD

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report2 min

Foot traffic in Adelaide's CBD has declined in recent years, according to data contained in city council documents.

According to the data, there were 138.8 million foot traffic visitors in 2023 — but that had dropped to 122 million by 2025.

The decline has prompted the state's Property Council to launch a broadside against the city council, but Adelaide's lord mayor has responded.

A decline in foot traffic in Adelaide's CBD has prompted a prominent property industry lobbyist to take a swipe at the city council, which he has accused of lacking "sophistication".

But the lord mayor has staunchly defended the council's approach to CBD visits, and responded at those she said "don't understand the city is a complex beast".

According to Adelaide City Council documents citing Kepler Analytics data, there were 138.8 million foot traffic visitors in 2023, before the figure dropped to 130.6 million in 2024 and 122 million in 2025.

A month-by-month dashboard, published by the Adelaide Economic Development Agency, shows 13.9 million visits were recorded citywide in the month of July 2023, before the figure fell to 10.9 million in July 2024.

In July 2025, there were 10.2 million visits and, in July of this year, 9.6 million visits.

Executive director of the state's Property Council, Bruce Djite, blamed factors including car parking, which he said was having a deterrent effect on visitors.

"This is what happens when you have — with all due respect — Adelaide city councillors who are very nice people but unfortunately lack the sophistication required to attract people into the city on a regular basis," he told 891 ABC Adelaide.

"We have a council that is at war with car parking without an alternative solution.

Mr Djite said a more significant factor than parking was housing, and he accused the council of failing to make best use of its building stock, more of which, he said, should be converted for residential use.

"What they need to do is have more residential in the city," he said.

"They could put some of their underutilised buildings to the development sector, so they could have professionals come in and deliver the residential supply that's required in the CBD."

Adelaide Lord Mayor Jane Lomax-Smith rejected Mr Djite's criticisms, but said she did not wish to "have a discussion about people's character".

"I'm not into criticising him for his sophistication — that's not my style," she said.

Cr Lomax-Smith said foot traffic figures were partly reflective of demographic changes.

"More people are working from home now than there were five years ago, and it's taken a while for the foot traffic to recover after COVID. There's been a bounce back," she said.

Cr Lomax-Smith said CBD parking in Adelaide compared favourably with other Australian capital cities, and added that the council's housing strategy was paying dividends.

"We've had an increase of 3.5 per cent in our residential population in the last year, and that's the largest increase of any council area in South Australia," she said.

Rundle Mall tailor Joseph Uzumcu said he had not noticed a decline in passers-by, and said his business was "doing incredibly well".

"People point fingers at other outside effects of why people are not coming into the city," he said.

"We've got to realise the population of Adelaide is [smaller than elsewhere].

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 10.1 7 87 -0.2 46.4
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 7.5 6 87 -0.3 46.4

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works