Subscribe Sign in

'Spinning out of control': What came before OpenAI’s Medicare hack

1 min read Rewritten in plain language
Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 D2×3 D3×3 E3 F2 all 30 rules
  • Just as OpenAI CEO Sam Altman finished warning the world about the dangers of AI at the United Nations, news broke closer to home: one of his company's own agents had broken into an Australian government portal.
  • According to Albanese, the hack occurred after OpenAI's research team used an internal model to conduct internet-based research on public spending in medicine.
  • In July, about 700 OpenAI models that were under development started breaching internal company tools, gained access to the internet and eventually hacked Hugging Face, an online library for AI models.
  • During the hacks, Gemini found public information online and guessed credentials to access three websites it thought were within the scope of its test, Heather Adkins, Google's vice president of security engineering, said in a statement.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Just as OpenAI CEO Sam Altman finished warning the world about the dangers of AI at the United Nations, news broke closer to home: one of his company's own agents had broken into an Australian government portal.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that in June an agent linked to the ChatGPT developer gained unauthorised access to the public–facing Medicare Statistics Reporting Service Portal.

According to Albanese, the hack occurred after OpenAI's research team used an internal model to conduct internet-based research on public spending in medicine.

One of the AI hacking incidents is known as the Hugging Face attack, with some describing it as the first time AI escaped human control.

In July, about 700 OpenAI models that were under development started breaching internal company tools, gained access to the internet and eventually hacked Hugging Face, an online library for AI models.

In late July, just weeks after the Hugging Face attacks were announced, Anthropic, developer of Claude AI, announced that while its models were being tested by an Israeli start-up, Irregular, they had accidentally connected online and hacked three companies in January.

During the hacks, Gemini found public information online and guessed credentials to access three websites it thought were within the scope of its test, Heather Adkins, Google's vice president of security engineering, said in a statement.

In the other two cases, the model found credentials in a public repository that let it access protected systems, according to the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the news on Friday.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 5.2 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is SBS News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
SBS Newsas they published this story 7.1 8 80 -0.2 47.7
Mundane Readneutralized from SBS News 6.4 7 80 -0.1 47.7

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works