Subscribe Sign in

Politics

The FAA’s plan to fix air traffic? $875M worth of AI

TechCrunch
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceGovernment and PolicyAir Traffic ControlIn Brief

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: The FAA’s plan to fix air traffic? $875 million $875M worth of AI

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: D1 all 30 rules
  • The Federal Aviation Administration has been struggling to manage an air traffic control shortage throughout the country.
  • A one-page readout on the program describes Smart as “a cloud-based platform system that enhances existing FAA air traffic management systems.”

2 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Terminal A, IAH 1901061350
Terminal A, IAH 1901061350 Patrick Feller / flickr, CC BY

The Federal Aviation Administration has been struggling to manage an air traffic control shortage throughout the country.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the FAA will soon launch Smart Routes and Trajectories — an automated software program designed to help streamline air traffic operations.

A one-page readout on the program describes Smart as “a cloud-based platform system that enhances existing FAA air traffic management systems.”

Earlier this year, the FAA also announced a “bold, new” hiring plan that the agency said would “erase the longstanding staffing shortage,” and the government is separately engaged in a broad effort to modernize the nation’s aging air traffic systems.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 5 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is TechCrunch's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
TechCrunchas they published this story 6.7 3 68 -0.5 45.1
Mundane Readneutralized from TechCrunch 6.7 3 68 -0.5 45.1

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works