Subscribe Sign in

The US government plans to use AI to help redact documents

Engadget
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceBig Tech

Show what we removed Rules applied: C3 D2×4 D3 D4 E3×3 all 30 rules
  • The DHS will use Google's AI tools to recommend information to be blacked out of FOIA requests.
  • Now, the government plans to use AI to handle that redaction chore for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, according to GitHub documents seen by The Washington Post.
  • By the end of September, the DHS will use AI for documents that make up over 10 percent of FOIA requests, around 100,000 to 140,000 in all.
  • The Interior Department uses Microsoft tools to redact potential attorney-client information, while the DoJ is using a Veriton tool called aiWARE to redact video.
  • Though the government is touting the tools as a way to save time, it could lead to even more blacked-out or missing documents.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

The DHS will use Google's AI tools to recommend information to be blacked out of FOIA requests.

Document redactions have been in the spotlight lately thanks to the US Justice Department's Epstein file release, which used it to black out text in millions of documents. Now, the government plans to use AI to handle that redaction chore for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, according to GitHub documents seen by The Washington Post.

Those documents state that US Customs and border enforcement, part of the Department of Homeland Security, will use Google's AI tools to recommend information that FOIA officers should redact. By the end of September, the DHS will use AI for documents that make up over 10 percent of FOIA requests, around 100,000 to 140,000 in all.

Following those recommendations, DHS employees will review the cases to ensure the requester gets what the document calls "accurate and complete" information, an interesting term considering the potential redaction. "[T]his automation is expected to significantly reduce processing times," the description states.

As part of its research, the Post discovered redaction-related AI tools in use or development by other agencies. The Interior Department uses Microsoft tools to redact potential attorney-client information, while the DoJ is using a Veriton tool called aiWARE to redact video. The Health and Human Services division (HHS) is developing its own tool, FRED, to redact unknown information. "FDA is responsibly exploring limited uses of AI to help FOIA staff process records more efficiently," a spokesperson told the Post.

Though the government is touting the tools as a way to save time, it could lead to even more blacked-out or missing documents. "I think we have to watch the government really carefully on how they use AI to redact records, because I think it's going to be a very powerful tool for secrecy," an FOIA expert at the University of Florida told The Washington Post.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is Engadget's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingPoliticalHappiness
Engadgetas they published this story 9.5 2 38 0.4 50.4
Mundane Readneutralized from Engadget 8.6 2 38 0 50.4

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works