Subscribe Sign in

Politics

'Too big to be contained': Anthony Albanese's AI plans met a test

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Politics

Show what we removed Rules applied: A2 A3×2 D1 D2×3 D3×5 E3×2 F2 all 30 rules
  • The hacking of a Medicare website by an OpenAI bot could mean a slew of regulatory issues are on the horizon for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, whose government has labelled the incident as "fundamentally unacceptable".
  • Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles called the incident "very serious" with a "relatively minor" impact.
  • Dennis Desmond, of cybersecurity firm RAVINN and an adjunct senior industry fellow at the University of the Sunshine Coast, said blaming a "rogue" agent wasn't enough.
  • Professor Toby Walsh, chief scientist of the AI Institute and scientia professor of AI at UNSW, said OpenAI should be prosecuted.
  • Whether OpenAI broke Australian law and should be penalised will be up to a review into reporting requirements, incident response, sharing information of AI, legislation and beefing up cybersecurity announced on Thursday.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

Headline as published: 'Too big to be contained': Anthony Albanese's AI plans met a major test

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

The hacking of a Medicare website by an OpenAI bot could mean a slew of regulatory issues are on the horizon for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, whose government has labelled the incident as "fundamentally unacceptable".

A rapid task force led by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, along with the Australian Signals Directorate, the AI Safety Institute and the Office of AI, was launched on Thursday to investigate.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles called the incident "very serious" with a "relatively minor" impact.

Central to the incident is an AI agent going beyond its parameters, or "scaling the fence", as Marles put it.

Dennis Desmond, of cybersecurity firm RAVINN and an adjunct senior industry fellow at the University of the Sunshine Coast, said blaming a "rogue" agent wasn't enough.

Raffaele Fabio Ciriello from the University of Sydney Business School agreed, saying the agent is "not a legal person", so responsibility turns on OpenAI and the people who "authorised, configured, or supervised the system".

The task force will examine whether any laws were broken, Marles said, but experts are divided on whether this is a matter for criminal law at all.

Professor Toby Walsh, chief scientist of the AI Institute and scientia professor of AI at UNSW, said OpenAI should be prosecuted.

Ciriello said Australian computer-offence laws can apply to unauthorised access, even when conduct occurs offshore.

Whether OpenAI broke Australian law and should be penalised will be up to a review into reporting requirements, incident response, sharing information of AI, legislation and beefing up cybersecurity announced on Thursday.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 3.4 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is SBS News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
SBS Newsas they published this story 6.2 13 78 -0.1 51.2
Mundane Readneutralized from SBS News 5.3 12 78 -0.1 51.2

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works