Subscribe Sign in

Science / France

Poorer nations will be among the last to benefit if global emissions cut to net zero

The Guardian Australia
3 min read Rewritten in plain language

Climate changePacific IslandsWorld NewsClimate ScienceGreenhouse Gas Emissions

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: Tropics Poorer nations will be among the last places to benefit if global greenhouse gas emissions cut to net zero

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A2 C3×4 C5 D2×4 D3×10 D4×2 F2×5 all 30 rules
  • Australian scientists found unequal impact of the climate change would not be reversed even if implicit goal of the 2015 Paris agreement is achieved
  • Temperatures have risen more significantly in tropical areas relative to levels than at higher latitudes, including in wealthier countries in Europe and North America.
  • The climate inequality study, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, was led by Dr Andrew King and colleagues at the University of Melbourne.
  • King said the fate of the planet’s poorest regions, which tend to be concentrated closer to the equator, would depend on how much greenhouse gas was emitted before the world reached net zero.
  • A separate report on the impact of climate change on the stateless, commissioned by the UN refugee agency and released with the Peter McMullin Centre on Statelessness, called on nations to support “the continuity of statehood” for countries facing climate damage.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

King said the fate of the planet’s poorest regions would depend on how much greenhouse gas was emitted before the world reached net zero.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report3 min

Australian scientists found unequal impact of the climate change would not be reversed even if implicit goal of the 2015 Paris agreement is achieved

The unequal impact of the climate change on the world’s poorest people has been highlighted by new research that finds the tropics will be among the last places to feel the benefits if the global community cuts greenhouse gas emissions to net zero.

Temperatures have risen more significantly in tropical areas relative to levels than at higher latitudes, including in wealthier countries in Europe and North America.

A team of Australian climate scientists found this inequality would not be reversed if global emissions reached net zero – the implicit goal of the 2015 Paris agreement – and could take “many decades to begin to reverse” if carbon dioxide was drawn from the atmosphere under a “net-negative emissions” plan.

The research coincided with the UN’s refugee agency releasing a report showing how the climate change was increasing the risk of people becoming stateless.

The climate inequality study, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, was led by Dr Andrew King and colleagues at the University of Melbourne. They looked at three sets of computer modelling experiments of the likely temperature changes if global emissions reached net zero and overlaid the results with countries’ gross domestic product.

“If we follow a path that is close to net zero, then the inequality we see in present day warming persists indefinitely,” King said. “The wealthier countries that have caused more of the problem are not those that are the most exposed, even beyond net zero. The regions that have not caused the warming are those that experience the most warming.”

King said the fate of the planet’s poorest regions, which tend to be concentrated closer to the equator, would depend on how much greenhouse gas was emitted before the world reached net zero.

“Even when we get to net zero, we have still emitted an enormous amount of carbon into the atmosphere and its effects will continue for centuries. We can’t easily undo all that damage,” he said. “Getting to net zero sooner means we are less likely to have that long-term warming after net zero. We need to get to net zero sooner to limit that inequality.”

King said tropical ecosystems, such as some coral reefs, had mostly evolved to exist in a narrower temperature range than ecosystems at higher latitudes and would continue to be heavily affected for longer as the world cut emissions.

A separate report on the impact of climate change on the stateless, commissioned by the UN refugee agency and released with the Peter McMullin Centre on Statelessness, called on nations to support “the continuity of statehood” for countries facing climate damage. It said those at risk included Pacific islands that were losing land to rising seas.

The agency estimated about 4.5 million people were stateless but said it accepted the number was probably much larger as stateless people were “invisible to official statistics”.

The report said the climate change risked creating more stateless people through displacement after climate-driven disasters such as fire, flood and sea level rise.

University of Melbourne Associate Prof Radha Govil, a report co-author, said there was a correlation between the regions most affected by climate change and statelessness.

The report recommended countries should be helped to digitise citizenship records, and steps should be taken to ensure children were afforded citizenship if they were left without parents after a disaster.

It said the risks to children were increased if mothers were not given the same rights as fathers to confer their own nationality to their children.

“The recommendations we have set out are absolutely doable,” said Govil. “They can stave of this risk of statelessness and get ahead of this problem.”

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingPoliticalSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story 14 16 65 -0.9 -0.6 49.2
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia 9.5 14 65 0 -0.1 49.2

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works