Subscribe Sign in

Courts

Trump criticises Supreme Court for rejecting restrictions on mail-in ballots

1 min read Rewritten in plain language
Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×3 A6 C1 C2 D2 D3×2 D4×3 E3×5 F2 all 30 rules
  • US President Donald Trump has criticised the Supreme Court for blocking his plan to restrict mail-in election ballots.
  • Mr Trump appointed three justices during his first term as president, building a 6-3 conservative majority and allowing the court to steer a rightward course since 2020.
  • Only conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas publicly dissented.
  • Mr Trump signed his executive order targeting mail-in ballots in March after years of casting doubt on their security, though he often votes by mail himself.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Mr Trump appointed three justices during his first term as president, building a 6-3 conservative majority and allowing the court to steer a rightward course since 2020.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

US President Donald Trump has criticised the Supreme Court for blocking his plan to restrict mail-in election ballots.

The regulation would have needed states to provide voter-specific data and use agency-approved mail-ballot envelopes that would be tracked using barcodes.

Attorney-General Todd Blanche says the administration is going to comply with the decision.

Mr Trump appointed three justices during his first term as president, building a 6-3 conservative majority and allowing the court to steer a rightward course since 2020.

On Monday, the court's decision preventing implementation of the rule was brief and unsigned, as is typical when it handles emergency requests.

Only conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas publicly dissented.

Mr Trump referred to them as "legends, both".

Critics said that the measure could disrupt the delivery of thousands of ballots as the November 3 vote approached and cause disruption, given imminent plans by many states to send out mail ballots to eligible voters.

Mr Trump signed his executive order targeting mail-in ballots in March after years of casting doubt on their security, though he often votes by mail himself.

The Supreme Court has delivered several election-related rulings in recent months that have benefited Republicans, although last Thursday it blocked Missouri from using a redrawn congressional map favouring Republicans.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 7.1 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingPoliticalSentimentHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 18.7 13 75 0.2 -0.7 24.2
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 11.8 10 75 0.2 -0.3 33

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works