Subscribe Sign in

Twitter workaround worked around again: X's lawyers cancel XCancel again

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Personal Tech

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A3 A4 A6 C1 D3×3 E3 all 30 rules
  • Nitter's repository archived as of September 11, 2026
  • Things were not looking good in August for the services, which allowed a user to view posts on X (formerly Twitter) without an account or having to endure adverts and accept trackers.
  • A few weeks later, the services were back up and running.
  • XCancel wrote, "We can't share more details," and added a link to X for users keen for content.
  • In the case of Nitter (and XCancel, which uses the project), the concern likely centered on how posts were viewed without an account, JavaScript, or ads.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Nitter's repository archived as of September 11, 2026.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Nitter's repository archived as of September 11, 2026

Nitter and XCancel, a pair of social media services which let you view posts on X without a X account, are down again after the latest round of legal wrangling.

While the XCancel site now displays the message "Unfortunately, due to a new development in the ongoing legal proceedings, we are required to suspend this service again until further notice," Nitter's site is offline, and the code repository was archived on September 11, 2026.

Things were not looking good in August for the services, which allowed a user to view posts on X (formerly Twitter) without an account or having to endure adverts and accept trackers. X's lawyers fired off a cease-and-desist letter, and the services acquiesced, going offline while the implications were digested.

A few weeks later, the services were back up and running. At the time, zedeus, Nitter's maintainer, wrote, "an announcement will be made within a week, once we're able to reveal more information."

Alas, that "more information" appears to be another cessation. XCancel wrote, "We can't share more details," and added a link to X for users keen for content.

It is difficult to say for sure if and when the services might be back, or if users have headed elsewhere for their microblogging fix. Users not wishing to sign up for a X account have plenty of alternatives – Mastodon and Bluesky, for example.

X has form when it comes to rolling out the lawyers to fend off perceived threats or alleged abuses of its services, and is within its rights to do so. In the case of Nitter (and XCancel, which uses the project), the concern likely centered on how posts were viewed without an account, JavaScript, or ads.

X also attempted to defend the Twitter and blue bird trademark and branding in a dispute with tweet.app. It kept hold of Twitter (despite ditching the name after Musk's takeover), but tweet.app snapped up the word 'tweet' and the bird imagery. That's for the time being, at least. ®

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Register's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Registeras they published this story 8.6 3 57 -0.2 33.8
Mundane Readneutralized from The Register 5.8 2 57 -0.2 33.8

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works